[Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
Hi We came to the problem when some developers took latest and failed to create the PG DB. The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with upstream code. Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run both on 8.4.x and 9.x the question is if we should ? I will be happy to hear your opinion on that. thanks Eli Meiska
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika@redhat.com> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:02:09 PM Subject: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
Hi
We came to the problem when some developers took latest and failed to create the PG DB. The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with upstream code. Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run both on 8.4.x and 9.x the question is if we should ?
if its not too hard then yes, it will save aome trouble to people also this 'breaks' what documented in the ovirt Prerequisites page: http://www.ovirt.org/Building_oVirt_engine#Prerequisites
I will be happy to hear your opinion on that.
thanks
Eli Meiska _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
On 14/02/2013 13:23, Omer Frenkel wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika@redhat.com> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:02:09 PM Subject: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
Hi
We came to the problem when some developers took latest and failed to create the PG DB. The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with upstream code. Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run both on 8.4.x and 9.x the question is if we should ?
if its not too hard then yes, it will save aome trouble to people also this 'breaks' what documented in the ovirt Prerequisites page: http://www.ovirt.org/Building_oVirt_engine#Prerequisites
I will be happy to hear your opinion on that.
thanks
we plan to release formal .el6 ovirt packages in the project, which many people use, so yes, need to support both.
Eli Meiska _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:02:09AM -0500, Eli Mesika wrote:
We came to the problem when some developers took latest and failed to create the PG DB. The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with upstream code. Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run both on 8.4.x and 9.x the question is if we should ?
Currently EL6 ships with 8.4 so forcing 9.x would make supporting EL6 much harder.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim@redhat.com> To: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel@redhat.com> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:39:45 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
On 14/02/2013 13:23, Omer Frenkel wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika@redhat.com> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:02:09 PM Subject: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
Hi
We came to the problem when some developers took latest and failed to create the PG DB. The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with upstream code. Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run both on 8.4.x and 9.x the question is if we should ?
if its not too hard then yes, it will save aome trouble to people also this 'breaks' what documented in the ovirt Prerequisites page: http://www.ovirt.org/Building_oVirt_engine#Prerequisites
I will be happy to hear your opinion on that.
thanks
we plan to release formal .el6 ovirt packages in the project, which many people use, so yes, need to support both. Suggested solution: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/12076
Eli Meiska _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Allon Mureinik" <amureini@redhat.com> To: "Itamar Heim" <iheim@redhat.com> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 6:34:53 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim@redhat.com> To: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel@redhat.com> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:39:45 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
On 14/02/2013 13:23, Omer Frenkel wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika@redhat.com> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel@ovirt.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:02:09 PM Subject: [Engine-devel] Forcing PG 9.x for upstream
Hi
We came to the problem when some developers took latest and failed to create the PG DB. The problem was that those developers used PG 8.4.x with upstream code. Currently, we can support that and fix the upstream code to run both on 8.4.x and 9.x the question is if we should ?
if its not too hard then yes, it will save aome trouble to people also this 'breaks' what documented in the ovirt Prerequisites page: http://www.ovirt.org/Building_oVirt_engine#Prerequisites
I will be happy to hear your opinion on that.
thanks
we plan to release formal .el6 ovirt packages in the project, which many people use, so yes, need to support both. Suggested solution: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/12076
Approved, Allon - Many thanks for your help
Eli Meiska _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
participants (6)
-
Allon Mureinik -
Eli Mesika -
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden -
Itamar Heim -
Omer Frenkel -
Yair Zaslavsky