Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere Thanks, michal
On 8 Nov 2019, at 10:21, Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
Note to vdsm - there are currently only 2 bugs targeted for backport to 4.3. Nothing else. Let’s stop wasting CI and people’s time on master...
Thanks, michal
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Michal Skrivanek < michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
Thanks, michal
+1 for dropping it. Help with patches removing it everywhere is welcome. For those currently using fedora 29, fedora 30 host side rpms are all built and available for master. We are still working on engine side support for it. -- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>*
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:31 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Michal Skrivanek < michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
Thanks, michal
+1 for dropping it. Help with patches removing it everywhere is welcome. For those currently using fedora 29, fedora 30 host side rpms are all built and available for master. We are still working on engine side support for it.
Pushed [0] and [1] to get rid of fc29 on vdsm and ovirt-provider-ovn respectively. [0] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104500 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104501
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>* _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/RHVKW3VH7EHKVB...
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:31 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:31 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Michal Skrivanek < michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
Thanks, michal
+1 for dropping it. Help with patches removing it everywhere is welcome. For those currently using fedora 29, fedora 30 host side rpms are all built and available for master. We are still working on engine side support for it.
Pushed [0] and [1] to get rid of fc29 on vdsm and ovirt-provider-ovn respectively.
On the vdsm patch I'm getting the following error: [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: ovirt-imageio-common [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: python3-ioprocess-1.3.0 [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] Error: Unable to find a match: ovirt-imageio-common python3-ioprocess-1.3.0 Should these pkgs would come from @Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>'s copr collection ? [0] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104500
[1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104501
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>* _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/RHVKW3VH7EHKVB...
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 12:10 Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:31 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:31 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Michal Skrivanek < michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
Thanks, michal
+1 for dropping it. Help with patches removing it everywhere is welcome. For those currently using fedora 29, fedora 30 host side rpms are all built and available for master. We are still working on engine side support for it.
Pushed [0] and [1] to get rid of fc29 on vdsm and ovirt-provider-ovn respectively.
On the vdsm patch I'm getting the following error:
[2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: ovirt-imageio-common [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: python3-ioprocess-1.3.0 [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] Error: Unable to find a match: ovirt-imageio-common python3-ioprocess-1.3.0
Should these pkgs would come from @Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>'s copr collection ?
No, they should be in tested[1] and snapshot[2] repo [1] https://resources.ovirt.org/repos/ovirt/tested/master/rpm/fc30/ [2] https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/fc30
[0] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104500
[1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104501
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>* _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/RHVKW3VH7EHKVB...
-- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>*
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:07 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 12:10 Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:31 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:31 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Michal Skrivanek < michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
Thanks, michal
+1 for dropping it. Help with patches removing it everywhere is welcome. For those currently using fedora 29, fedora 30 host side rpms are all built and available for master. We are still working on engine side support for it.
Pushed [0] and [1] to get rid of fc29 on vdsm and ovirt-provider-ovn respectively.
On the vdsm patch I'm getting the following error:
[2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: ovirt-imageio-common [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: python3-ioprocess-1.3.0 [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] Error: Unable to find a match: ovirt-imageio-common python3-ioprocess-1.3.0
Should these pkgs would come from @Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>'s copr collection ?
No, they should be in tested[1] and snapshot[2] repo
[1] https://resources.ovirt.org/repos/ovirt/tested/master/rpm/fc30/ [2] https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/fc30
Right, my bad - had forgotten to symlink the ....repos.fc30 file . Thanks.
[0] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104500
[1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104501
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>* _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/RHVKW3VH7EHKVB...
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>*
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:19 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:07 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 12:10 Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:31 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:31 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Michal Skrivanek < michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
Thanks, michal
+1 for dropping it. Help with patches removing it everywhere is welcome. For those currently using fedora 29, fedora 30 host side rpms are all built and available for master. We are still working on engine side support for it.
Pushed [0] and [1] to get rid of fc29 on vdsm and ovirt-provider-ovn respectively.
On the vdsm patch I'm getting the following error:
[2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: ovirt-imageio-common [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: python3-ioprocess-1.3.0 [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] Error: Unable to find a match: ovirt-imageio-common python3-ioprocess-1.3.0
Should these pkgs would come from @Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>'s copr collection ?
No, they should be in tested[1] and snapshot[2] repo
[1] https://resources.ovirt.org/repos/ovirt/tested/master/rpm/fc30/ [2] https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/fc30
Right, my bad - had forgotten to symlink the ....repos.fc30 file .
Is there going to be a lago fc30 release ?... If not, are we supposed to install it via pip ?
Thanks.
[0] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104500
[1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104501
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>* _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/RHVKW3VH7EHKVB...
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>*
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:50 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:19 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:07 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 12:10 Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:31 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:31 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Michal Skrivanek < michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> ha scritto:
> Hi, > any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 > weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI > resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere > > Thanks, > michal
+1 for dropping it. Help with patches removing it everywhere is welcome. For those currently using fedora 29, fedora 30 host side rpms are all built and available for master. We are still working on engine side support for it.
Pushed [0] and [1] to get rid of fc29 on vdsm and ovirt-provider-ovn respectively.
On the vdsm patch I'm getting the following error:
[2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: ovirt-imageio-common [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: python3-ioprocess-1.3.0 [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] Error: Unable to find a match: ovirt-imageio-common python3-ioprocess-1.3.0
Should these pkgs would come from @Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>'s copr collection ?
No, they should be in tested[1] and snapshot[2] repo
[1] https://resources.ovirt.org/repos/ovirt/tested/master/rpm/fc30/ [2] https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/fc30
Right, my bad - had forgotten to symlink the ....repos.fc30 file .
Is there going to be a lago fc30 release ?... If not, are we supposed to install it via pip ?
While attempting to remove fc29 from vdsm's automation - replacing it w/ fc30 - I'm stuck because there's no lago release for fc30 - [0]. In fc29, lago was installed via RPM, in [1]. Shouldn't there be a release for fc30 ? [0] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/standard-manual-runner/... [1] - https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/blob/master/automation/check-network.functiona...
Thanks.
[0] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104500
[1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104501
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>* _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/RHVKW3VH7EHKVB...
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>*
+Anton Marchukov <amarchuk@redhat.com> +Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> can you answer on lago for fc30? Il giorno lun 11 nov 2019 alle ore 09:31 Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:50 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:19 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:07 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 12:10 Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:31 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:31 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Il giorno ven 8 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Michal Skrivanek < > michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> ha scritto: > >> Hi, >> any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 >> weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI >> resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere >> >> Thanks, >> michal > > > +1 for dropping it. Help with patches removing it everywhere is > welcome. > For those currently using fedora 29, fedora 30 host side rpms are > all built and available for master. > We are still working on engine side support for it. >
Pushed [0] and [1] to get rid of fc29 on vdsm and ovirt-provider-ovn respectively.
On the vdsm patch I'm getting the following error:
[2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: ovirt-imageio-common [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] No match for argument: python3-ioprocess-1.3.0 [2019-11-08T10:51:56.867Z] Error: Unable to find a match: ovirt-imageio-common python3-ioprocess-1.3.0
Should these pkgs would come from @Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>'s copr collection ?
No, they should be in tested[1] and snapshot[2] repo
[1] https://resources.ovirt.org/repos/ovirt/tested/master/rpm/fc30/ [2] https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/fc30
Right, my bad - had forgotten to symlink the ....repos.fc30 file .
Is there going to be a lago fc30 release ?... If not, are we supposed to install it via pip ?
While attempting to remove fc29 from vdsm's automation - replacing it w/ fc30 - I'm stuck because there's no lago release for fc30 - [0]. In fc29, lago was installed via RPM, in [1].
Shouldn't there be a release for fc30 ?
[0] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/standard-manual-runner/... [1] - https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/blob/master/automation/check-network.functiona...
Thanks.
[0] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104500
[1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/104501
> > > -- > > Sandro Bonazzola > > MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > > sbonazzo@redhat.com > <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. > Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. > <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>* > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/RHVKW3VH7EHKVB... >
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>*
-- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours. <https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>*
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:22 AM Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, any reason to keep Fedora 29 around anymore? It’s going EOL in 3 weeks. We usually need newer stuff anyway, and it would also save CI resources since we already added el8 and f30 everywhere
We used Fedora 29 for working on incremental backup, since we need to work with upstream libvirt and qemu and it was easy to build on Fedora, and vdsm was not ready on python 3. We are moving now to Fedora 30/python 3 for incremental backup, and so far it seems to work fine for adding a host and doing virt-v2v imports. Eyal, can you update if current incremental patches work on Fedora 30? Having some python 2 build is also useful for keeping the source compatible with python 2, to make backporting to 4.3 easier. This reason is still true even if we stop using it for development, but since Fedora 29 will be EOL in 2 weeks it seems that we need to get rid of this build soon. We still have el7 build, but this build can break soon as well since we need to make changes in lvm and multipath configuration will not be compatible with CentOS 7, and we don't want to waste time on creating compatible configurations at build time or runtime, since nobody needs this. So it looks like we need to get rid of python 2 builds now. Nir
Thanks, michal _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/TWX7LC4SHDEHT4...
participants (4)
-
Michal Skrivanek -
Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso -
Nir Soffer -
Sandro Bonazzola