3:53 a.m.
Hi all,
we're trying to move vdsm tests to el8.
AFAIK we don't have native el8 slaves in the CI yet, so our el8 stages run
on el7 with el8 mocked.
There are some issues with scripts setting up the env for storage tests -
they are refusing to work on older
kernel versions.
I have an idea for a workaround - until now we were using 'host-distro:
same' in our
'stdci.yaml'. I can see that this option can also take a value of
'better/newer' [1], but that won't work
for el8. Could we possibly implement something like [2] ? That would allow
us to i.e. define an el8
mocked env with 'host-distro: fc30' enforcing native fc30 host. I assume
this would be a temporary
workaround only, until we have native el8 slaves.
Regards, Marcin
[1]
https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0d...
[2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/
4:20 a.m.
On středa 16. října 2019 10:53:45 CEST Marcin Sobczyk wrote:
Hi all,
we're trying to move vdsm tests to el8.
AFAIK we don't have native el8 slaves in the CI yet, so our el8 stages run
on el7 with el8 mocked.
There are some issues with scripts setting up the env for storage tests -
they are refusing to work on older
kernel versions.
I have an idea for a workaround - until now we were using 'host-distro:
same' in our
'stdci.yaml'. I can see that this option can also take a value of
'better/newer' [1], but that won't work
for el8. Could we possibly implement something like [2] ? That would allow
us to i.e. define an el8
mocked env with 'host-distro: fc30' enforcing native fc30 host. I assume
this would be a temporary
workaround only, until we have native el8 slaves.
if it works, it would be great
Regards, Marcin
[1]
https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0dab3
5d/pipelines/libs/stdci_runner.groovy#L127 [2]
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/
5:48 a.m.
New subject: workaround for the lack of native el8 slaves in the CI
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 12:21, Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On středa 16. října 2019 10:53:45 CEST Marcin Sobczyk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we're trying to move vdsm tests to el8.
>
> AFAIK we don't have native el8 slaves in the CI yet, so our el8 stages
run
> on el7 with el8 mocked.
> There are some issues with scripts setting up the env for storage tests -
> they are refusing to work on older
> kernel versions.
>
> I have an idea for a workaround - until now we were using 'host-distro:
> same' in our
> 'stdci.yaml'. I can see that this option can also take a value of
> 'better/newer' [1], but that won't work
> for el8. Could we possibly implement something like [2] ? That would
allow
> us to i.e. define an el8
> mocked env with 'host-distro: fc30' enforcing native fc30 host. I assume
> this would be a temporary
> workaround only, until we have native el8 slaves.
if it works, it would be great
Given the rapid pace in which Fedora versions go EOL, I wouldn't want to
support this kind of syntax. Instead, I suggest we just make sure that
`newer` means fc30+ for el8.
We're not really planning to ever enable EL8 slaves, since there is a huge
amount of issues we'll need to solve and test to make that happen, and
we're looking to deprecate the static way in which we currently manage
slaves. In other words, any workaround you implement now, may not be as
temporary as you think.
> Regards, Marcin
>
> [1]
>
https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0dab3
> 5d/pipelines/libs/stdci_runner.groovy#L127 [2]
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/V765YTTZLZV...
--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
5:54 a.m.
New subject: workaround for the lack of native el8 slaves in the CI
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:50 PM Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 12:21, Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On středa 16. října 2019 10:53:45 CEST Marcin Sobczyk wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we're trying to move vdsm tests to el8.
> >
> > AFAIK we don't have native el8 slaves in the CI yet, so our el8 stages
> run
> > on el7 with el8 mocked.
> > There are some issues with scripts setting up the env for storage tests
> -
> > they are refusing to work on older
> > kernel versions.
> >
> > I have an idea for a workaround - until now we were using 'host-distro:
> > same' in our
> > 'stdci.yaml'. I can see that this option can also take a value of
> > 'better/newer' [1], but that won't work
> > for el8. Could we possibly implement something like [2] ? That would
> allow
> > us to i.e. define an el8
> > mocked env with 'host-distro: fc30' enforcing native fc30 host. I
assume
> > this would be a temporary
> > workaround only, until we have native el8 slaves.
>
> if it works, it would be great
>
Given the rapid pace in which Fedora versions go EOL, I wouldn't want to
support this kind of syntax. Instead, I suggest we just make sure that
`newer` means fc30+ for el8.
Barak, how soon can we apply this workaround so we can unblock CI for
projects?
We're not really planning to ever enable EL8 slaves, since there is a huge
amount of issues we'll need to solve and test to make that happen, and
we're looking to deprecate the static way in which we currently manage
slaves. In other words, any workaround you implement now, may not be as
temporary as you think.
>
> > Regards, Marcin
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0dab3
> > 5d/pipelines/libs/stdci_runner.groovy#L127 [2]
> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/V765YTTZLZV...
>
--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/EDVX2VCPEHD...
--
Eyal edri
He / Him / His
MANAGER
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig>
phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
6:59 a.m.
New subject: workaround for the lack of native el8 slaves in the CI
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 13:54, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:50 PM Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 12:21, Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On středa 16. října 2019 10:53:45 CEST Marcin Sobczyk wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > we're trying to move vdsm tests to el8.
>> >
>> > AFAIK we don't have native el8 slaves in the CI yet, so our el8 stages
>> run
>> > on el7 with el8 mocked.
>> > There are some issues with scripts setting up the env for storage
>> tests -
>> > they are refusing to work on older
>> > kernel versions.
>> >
>> > I have an idea for a workaround - until now we were using 'host-distro:
>> > same' in our
>> > 'stdci.yaml'. I can see that this option can also take a value of
>> > 'better/newer' [1], but that won't work
>> > for el8. Could we possibly implement something like [2] ? That would
>> allow
>> > us to i.e. define an el8
>> > mocked env with 'host-distro: fc30' enforcing native fc30 host. I
>> assume
>> > this would be a temporary
>> > workaround only, until we have native el8 slaves.
>>
>> if it works, it would be great
>>
>
> Given the rapid pace in which Fedora versions go EOL, I wouldn't want to
> support this kind of syntax. Instead, I suggest we just make sure that
> `newer` means fc30+ for el8.
>
Barak, how soon can we apply this workaround so we can unblock CI for
projects?
Here is a patch that does that:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/104165/
Now its just a matter of reviews
>
> We're not really planning to ever enable EL8 slaves, since there is a
> huge amount of issues we'll need to solve and test to make that happen, and
> we're looking to deprecate the static way in which we currently manage
> slaves. In other words, any workaround you implement now, may not be as
> temporary as you think.
>
>
>>
>> > Regards, Marcin
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0dab3
>> > 5d/pipelines/libs/stdci_runner.groovy#L127 [2]
>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>> List Archives:
>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/V765YTTZLZV...
>>
>
>
> --
> Barak Korren
> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
> Red Hat EMEA
> redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/EDVX2VCPEHD...
>
--
Eyal edri
He / Him / His
MANAGER
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIZATION
SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig>
phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ #cp-devel)
--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
7:04 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:53 AM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all,
we're trying to move vdsm tests to el8.
AFAIK we don't have native el8 slaves in the CI yet, so our el8 stages run
on el7 with el8 mocked.
There are some issues with scripts setting up the env for storage tests -
they are refusing to work on older
kernel versions.
This is true, but the issue is only xfs. We can enable the tests by
switching to ext4 temporarily.
We can revert this:
commit b520d0df06129dd9d8d7f76f08425a3007962ab5
Author: Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
Date: Tue Aug 27 18:32:19 2019 +0300
tests: Revert "tests: use ext4 for userstorage"
Then moving to https://github.com/nirs/userstorage will make it possible to
have an
optional xfs backend that will be skipped only on Jenkins, but will run the
xfs tests on
travis and when running locally. This is what we do now in imageio:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/103958/
We can enable xfs again when we have a way to run el8 slaves on fedora >=
29.
I have an idea for a workaround - until now we were using 'host-distro:
same' in our
'stdci.yaml'. I can see that this option can also take a value of
'better/newer' [1], but that won't work
for el8. Could we possibly implement something like [2] ? That would allow
us to i.e. define an el8
mocked env with 'host-distro: fc30' enforcing native fc30 host. I assume
this would be a temporary
workaround only, until we have native el8 slaves.
Regards, Marcin
[1]
https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0d...
[2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/
8:28 a.m.
New subject: workaround for the lack of native el8 slaves in the CI
On 22 Oct 2019, at 14:04, Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:53 AM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk(a)redhat.com
<mailto:msobczyk@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
we're trying to move vdsm tests to el8.
AFAIK we don't have native el8 slaves in the CI yet, so our el8 stages run on el7
with el8 mocked.
There are some issues with scripts setting up the env for storage tests - they are
refusing to work on older
kernel versions.
This is true, but the issue is only xfs. We can enable the tests by switching to ext4
temporarily.
We can revert this:
commit b520d0df06129dd9d8d7f76f08425a3007962ab5
Author: Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com>>
Date: Tue Aug 27 18:32:19 2019 +0300
tests: Revert "tests: use ext4 for userstorage"
Then moving to https://github.com/nirs/userstorage
<https://github.com/nirs/userstorage> will make it possible to have an
optional xfs backend that will be skipped only on Jenkins, but will run the xfs tests on
travis and when running locally. This is what we do now in imageio:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/103958/ <https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/103958/>
We can enable xfs again when we have a way to run el8 slaves on fedora >= 29.
That sounds great, can you go for it? (at least the first part, to unblock the jenkins CI
)
I have an idea for a workaround - until now we were using 'host-distro: same' in
our
'stdci.yaml'. I can see that this option can also take a value of
'better/newer' [1], but that won't work
for el8. Could we possibly implement something like [2] ? That would allow us to i.e.
define an el8
mocked env with 'host-distro: fc30' enforcing native fc30 host. I assume this
would be a temporary
workaround only, until we have native el8 slaves.
Regards, Marcin
[1]
https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0d...
<https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0d...
[2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/ <https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/>
12:52 p.m.
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 16:28, Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On 22 Oct 2019, at 14:04, Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:53 AM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we're trying to move vdsm tests to el8.
>
> AFAIK we don't have native el8 slaves in the CI yet, so our el8 stages
> run on el7 with el8 mocked.
> There are some issues with scripts setting up the env for storage tests -
> they are refusing to work on older
> kernel versions.
>
This is true, but the issue is only xfs. We can enable the tests by
switching to ext4 temporarily.
We can revert this:
commit b520d0df06129dd9d8d7f76f08425a3007962ab5
Author: Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
Date: Tue Aug 27 18:32:19 2019 +0300
tests: Revert "tests: use ext4 for userstorage"
Then moving to https://github.com/nirs/userstorage will make it possible
to have an
optional xfs backend that will be skipped only on Jenkins, but will run
the xfs tests on
travis and when running locally. This is what we do now in imageio:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/103958/
We can enable xfs again when we have a way to run el8 slaves on fedora >=
29.
That sounds great, can you go for it? (at least the first part, to unblock
the jenkins CI )
Reminder that we have a one-liner patch that would probably unblock things
as well:
- https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/104165/
I have an idea for a workaround - until now we were using 'host-distro:
> same' in our
> 'stdci.yaml'. I can see that this option can also take a value of
> 'better/newer' [1], but that won't work
> for el8. Could we possibly implement something like [2] ? That would
> allow us to i.e. define an el8
> mocked env with 'host-distro: fc30' enforcing native fc30 host. I assume
> this would be a temporary
> workaround only, until we have native el8 slaves.
>
> Regards, Marcin
>
> [1]
>
https://github.com/oVirt/jenkins/blob/a796094bfd15f1a85b9f630aaeb25ce6e0d...
> [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104091/
>
>
--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
1670
days inactive
1677
days old
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Barak Korren -
Eyal Edri -
Marcin Sobczyk -
Michal Skrivanek -
Nir Soffer -
Vojtech Juranek