Re: [Engine-devel] [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-11-27
Il 29/11/2013 13:13, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:49:59AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 29/11/2013 09:43, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda and roll Call (doron, 15:02:42) * 3.3 update releases (doron, 15:04:23) * 3.4 planning (doron, 15:04:24) * conferences and workshops (doron, 15:04:26) * infra update (doron, 15:04:27) * other topics (doron, 15:04:29) * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/projects/ovirt-release ~ (danken, 15:12:58) * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21794 (mburns, 15:15:04) * LINK: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-release/16800/ (mburns, 15:15:48) * mburns to add sbonazzo as a maintainer to support ovirt-release project (doron, 15:18:17)
ovirt-release-9 released yesterday
BTW: I see that this package contains /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-virt-preview.repo (and ovirt-release-fedora-8-1.noarch already did so) By default all lines are disabled in it. When and how this repo should be enabled? Only when using nightly or only under developers/maintainers indications?
I think that fedora-virt-preview should be used with nightly, stable shouldn't need it. However, since fedora-virt-preview contains vdsm - related packages not needed if you run only ovirt-engine (without using the same host as hypervisor) I think it's better to wait for VDSM guys answer.
Vdsm is not in http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-20/x86_64/
virt-preview is not needed for ovirt-3.3, and frankly, I think it should be dropped from ovirt-release.
It used to be needed on the nodes when vdsm required a version of libvirt that was not yet in Fedora. Now that we have el6 as a fully-supported platform, and given that el6 is missing from virt-preview, virt-preview is much less helpful to us.
Dan.
So, any objection in removing virt-preview from ovirt-release? What about nightly? Will it be needed there? -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 01:18:53PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 29/11/2013 13:13, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:49:59AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 29/11/2013 09:43, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda and roll Call (doron, 15:02:42) * 3.3 update releases (doron, 15:04:23) * 3.4 planning (doron, 15:04:24) * conferences and workshops (doron, 15:04:26) * infra update (doron, 15:04:27) * other topics (doron, 15:04:29) * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/projects/ovirt-release ~ (danken, 15:12:58) * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21794 (mburns, 15:15:04) * LINK: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-release/16800/ (mburns, 15:15:48) * mburns to add sbonazzo as a maintainer to support ovirt-release project (doron, 15:18:17)
ovirt-release-9 released yesterday
BTW: I see that this package contains /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-virt-preview.repo (and ovirt-release-fedora-8-1.noarch already did so) By default all lines are disabled in it. When and how this repo should be enabled? Only when using nightly or only under developers/maintainers indications?
I think that fedora-virt-preview should be used with nightly, stable shouldn't need it. However, since fedora-virt-preview contains vdsm - related packages not needed if you run only ovirt-engine (without using the same host as hypervisor) I think it's better to wait for VDSM guys answer.
Vdsm is not in http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-20/x86_64/
virt-preview is not needed for ovirt-3.3, and frankly, I think it should be dropped from ovirt-release.
It used to be needed on the nodes when vdsm required a version of libvirt that was not yet in Fedora. Now that we have el6 as a fully-supported platform, and given that el6 is missing from virt-preview, virt-preview is much less helpful to us.
Dan.
So, any objection in removing virt-preview from ovirt-release? What about nightly? Will it be needed there?
Should be removed from both, since it is currently unused. We could reintroduce it if the need arises.
participants (2)
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Sandro Bonazzola