On 06/10/2013 05:05 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 10:04:22AM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 06/01/2013 05:57 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> puppet is a good name and we should defiantly open a repo for it.
>
> infra-puppet or puppet-infra or admin-puppet maybe?
> (I think some context in the name is needed)
I'd prefer infra-puppet then because puppet-infra looks too much like
the puppet module naming scheme and implies a puppet module.
if no more comments by tomorrow, please ping me and will be created.
thanks,
Itamar
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
<ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl>
>>> To: infra(a)ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1:19:29 PM
>>> Subject: New gerrit repo for puppet
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> As I mailed before in another thread, I'd like a gerrit repository to
>>> store the puppet environment(s) for the infra team and to replace
>>>
https://github.com/ekohl/ovirt-infra-puppet.
>>>
>>> I'd propose the name 'puppet' because it's clear and I
don't think it
>>> will conflict with other repositories. If the ovirt project would
>>> maintain a puppet module to manage ovirt using puppet, the naming
>>> convention commonly used would name it puppet-ovirt.
>>>
>>> Permission wise I think ovirt infra should be maintainer.
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra