This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/23/2013 07:34 AM, Alexander Rydekull wrote:
16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in linode01, under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed) 16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwa= de on this - he set it up iirc) 16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup 16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought 16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingl= y =20 All the roads lead to quaid. =20 All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflate= d? Or can we remove that? All in all, is there a difference on the backups in gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup?
Heh, I didn't know we had an uncompressed backup going there too. It was something we set up on the fly way-back-when, and I haven't messed with it. If we have a safe compressed backup, let's blow away the uncompressed backup. Let me know when I can return the space to Linode. - Karsten --=20 Karsten 'quaid' Wade http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 --IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iD8DBQFR7ru92ZIOBq0ODEERAns9AJ0YsTbJq0DmHxEuXWUCsXgFpSj5cgCfcX6I Iwsbl4sWPv3r0hHTmVqIHv4= =7Hy3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA--