Re: About gerrit backups and space on resources.ovirt.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 07/23/2013 07:34 AM, Alexander Rydekull wrote:
16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in
linode01,
under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and
gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed)
16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwa=
de
on this - he set it up iirc)
16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup
16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought
16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingl=
y
=20
All the roads lead to quaid.
=20
All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflate=
d?
Or can we remove that?
All in all, is there a difference on the backups in
gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with
gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup?
Heh, I didn't know we had an uncompressed backup going there too. It was
something we set up on the fly way-back-when, and I haven't messed with
it. If we have a safe compressed backup, let's blow away the
uncompressed backup. Let me know when I can return the space to Linode.
- Karsten
--=20
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
--IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iD8DBQFR7ru92ZIOBq0ODEERAns9AJ0YsTbJq0DmHxEuXWUCsXgFpSj5cgCfcX6I
Iwsbl4sWPv3r0hHTmVqIHv4=
=7Hy3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA--
Attachments:
- attachment.bin (multipart/signed — 1.9 KB)