Re: [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master (ovirt-engine) ] [ 18-10-2018 ] [ 002_bootstrap.add_hosts ]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade > I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ has > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope > it would grab the correct one. > I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available. Fingers crossed. > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some >> > issues >> > with dependencies. >> > >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please >> > update on the issue? >> > >> > full log is here; >> > >> > >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... >> > >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >> > >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Dafna >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >> *extras*. >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to >> deliver: >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos >> extra packages >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >> [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >> [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >> [4] - >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... >> >> > >> >