On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > We have a failure in upgrade suite. > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some issues > with dependencies. > > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please > update on the issue? > > full log is here; > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... > > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ > > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R > > Thanks, > Dafna > Hi all, I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, which are available on the centos *extra* repo. Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the *extras*. Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to deliver: ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos extra packages [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ [4] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... > >

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in upgrade > I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ has > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so hope > it would grab the correct one. > I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the latest one available. Fingers crossed. > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some >> > issues >> > with dependencies. >> > >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you please >> > update on the issue? >> > >> > full log is here; >> > >> > >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... >> > >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >> > >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Dafna >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >> *extras*. >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to >> deliver: >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos >> extra packages >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >> [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >> [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >> [4] - >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... >> >> > >> >

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and > not 2.10 > is that package bump merged? No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in >> > upgrade >> > I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >> > has >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so >> > hope >> > it would grab the correct one. >> > >> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the >> latest one available. >> >> Fingers crossed. >> >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some >> >> > issues >> >> > with dependencies. >> >> > >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you >> >> > please >> >> > update on the issue? >> >> > >> >> > full log is here; >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... >> >> > >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >> >> > >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Dafna >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >> >> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >> >> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >> >> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >> >> *extras*. >> >> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >> >> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >> >> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to >> >> deliver: >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos >> >> extra packages @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump the ovs version >> >> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >> >> [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >> >> [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >> >> [4] - >> >> >> >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... >> >> >> >> > >> >> >

Any updates, still failing? On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > adding sandron > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < > mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using >> openvswitch2.9 and >> > not 2.10 >> > is that package bump merged? >> >> No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in >> >> > upgrade >> >> > I do see that >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >> >> > has >> >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm >> so >> >> > hope >> >> > it would grab the correct one. >> >> > >> >> >> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. >> >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the >> >> latest one available. >> >> >> >> Fingers crossed. >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >> >> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >> >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. >> >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are >> some >> >> >> > issues >> >> >> > with dependencies. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you >> >> >> > please >> >> >> > update on the issue? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > full log is here; >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >> >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >> >> >> > >> >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> > Dafna >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >> >> >> >> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk >> libraries, >> >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >> >> >> >> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >> >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk >> >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >> >> >> >> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch >> 2.9 >> >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the >> >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch >> because >> >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >> >> >> *extras*. >> >> >> >> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 >> with >> >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >> >> >> >> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 >> >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - >> at >> >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >> >> >> >> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we >> want to >> >> >> deliver: >> >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >> >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos >> >> >> extra packages >> >> @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump >> the ovs version >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >> >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >> >> >> [2] - >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >> >> >> [3] - >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >> >> >> [4] - >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > -- GALIT ROSENTHAL SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> galit(a)gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 <https://red.ht/sig>

openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I see results. thanks, Dafna On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help > with the tagging issue > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Any updates, still failing? >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> adding sandron >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < >>> mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using >>>> openvswitch2.9 and >>>> > not 2.10 >>>> > is that package bump merged? >>>> >>>> No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue >>>> in >>>> >> > upgrade >>>> >> > I do see that >>>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >>>> >> > has >>>> >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and >>>> dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so >>>> >> > hope >>>> >> > it would grab the correct one. >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. >>>> >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the >>>> >> latest one available. >>>> >> >>>> >> Fingers crossed. >>>> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>> >> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >> > Hi, >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >>>> >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk >>>> deps. >>>> >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are >>>> some >>>> >> >> > issues >>>> >> >> > with dependencies. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can >>>> you >>>> >> >> > please >>>> >> >> > update on the issue? >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > full log is here; >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >>>> >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Thanks, >>>> >> >> > Dafna >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Hi all, >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk >>>> libraries, >>>> >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >>>> >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us >>>> dpdk >>>> >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not >>>> openvswitch 2.9 >>>> >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in >>>> the >>>> >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch >>>> because >>>> >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >>>> >> >> *extras*. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 >>>> with >>>> >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using >>>> ovs-2.10 >>>> >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log >>>> - at >>>> >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we >>>> want to >>>> >> >> deliver: >>>> >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >>>> >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from >>>> centos >>>> >> >> extra packages >>>> >>>> @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump >>>> the ovs version >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >>>> >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >>>> >> >> [2] - >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >>>> >> >> [3] - >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >>>> >> >> [4] - >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> GALIT ROSENTHAL >> >> SOFTWARE ENGINEER >> >> Red Hat >> >> <https://www.redhat.com/> >> >> galit(a)gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 >> <https://red.ht/sig> >> >

I am starting to see master jobs passing so it seems the issue is resolved https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt-master_cha... On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I'm back at the office tomorrow, let me know if anything else else is > needed. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:34 Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >> >> I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once >> I see results. >> >> thanks, >> Dafna >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help >>> with the tagging issue >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Any updates, still failing? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> adding sandron >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < >>>>> mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using >>>>>> openvswitch2.9 and >>>>>> > not 2.10 >>>>>> > is that package bump merged? >>>>>> >>>>>> No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>>>> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the >>>>>> issue in >>>>>> >> > upgrade >>>>>> >> > I do see that >>>>>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >>>>>> >> > has >>>>>> >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and >>>>>> dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so >>>>>> >> > hope >>>>>> >> > it would grab the correct one. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that >>>>>> works. >>>>>> >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push >>>>>> the >>>>>> >> latest one available. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Fingers crossed. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>>>> >> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >> > Hi, >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >>>>>> >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk >>>>>> deps. >>>>>> >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there >>>>>> are some >>>>>> >> >> > issues >>>>>> >> >> > with dependencies. >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can >>>>>> you >>>>>> >> >> > please >>>>>> >> >> > update on the issue? >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > full log is here; >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >>>>>> >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > Thanks, >>>>>> >> >> > Dafna >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Hi all, >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk >>>>>> libraries, >>>>>> >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the >>>>>> current >>>>>> >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us >>>>>> dpdk >>>>>> >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not >>>>>> openvswitch 2.9 >>>>>> >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled >>>>>> in the >>>>>> >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch >>>>>> because >>>>>> >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not >>>>>> the >>>>>> >> >> *extras*. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using >>>>>> ovs-2.10 with >>>>>> >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using >>>>>> ovs-2.10 >>>>>> >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host >>>>>> yum.log - at >>>>>> >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what >>>>>> we want to >>>>>> >> >> deliver: >>>>>> >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >>>>>> >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from >>>>>> centos >>>>>> >> >> extra packages >>>>>> >>>>>> @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump >>>>>> the ovs version >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >>>>>> >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >>>>>> >> >> [2] - >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >>>>>> >> >> [3] - >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >>>>>> >> >> [4] - >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> GALIT ROSENTHAL >>>> >>>> SOFTWARE ENGINEER >>>> >>>> Red Hat >>>> >>>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>> >>>> galit(a)gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 >>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>> >>>