I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I
see results.
thanks,
Dafna
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help
with
the tagging issue
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Any updates, still failing?
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> adding sandron
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <
>> mdbarroso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using
>>> openvswitch2.9 and
>>> > not 2.10
>>> > is that package bump merged?
>>>
>>> No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso
>>> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>> >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the
issue
>>> in
>>> >> > upgrade
>>> >> > I do see that
>>>
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/
>>> >> > has
>>> >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and
dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm
>>> so
>>> >> > hope
>>> >> > it would grab the correct one.
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works.
>>> >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push
the
>>> >> latest one available.
>>> >>
>>> >> Fingers crossed.
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso
>>> >> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron
<dron(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> > Hi,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite.
>>> >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to
dpdk deps.
>>> >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package
there are
>>> some
>>> >> >> > issues
>>> >> >> > with dependencies.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well -
Miguel, can you
>>> >> >> > please
>>> >> >> > update on the issue?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > full log is here;
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti...
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the
packge:
>>> >> >> >
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > error for jobs:
https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Thanks,
>>> >> >> > Dafna
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Hi all,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk
>>> libraries,
>>> >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag
the current
>>> >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get
us
>>> dpdk
>>> >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not
>>> openvswitch 2.9
>>> >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being
pulled in
>>> the
>>> >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your
patch
>>> because
>>> >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo,
not the
>>> >> >> *extras*.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using
ovs-2.10
>>> with
>>> >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using
ovs-2.10
>>> >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host
yum.log -
>>> at
>>> >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on
what we
>>> want to
>>> >> >> deliver:
>>> >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig
>>> >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies
from
>>> centos
>>> >> >> extra packages
>>>
>>> @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump
>>> the ovs version
>>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> [0] -
https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364
>>> >> >> [1] -
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/
>>> >> >> [2] -
>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/
>>> >> >> [3] -
>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/
>>> >> >> [4] -
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp...
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> GALIT ROSENTHAL
>
> SOFTWARE ENGINEER
>
> Red Hat
>
> <
https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> galit(a)gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230
> <
https://red.ht/sig>
>