Re: repo request process

> >all "voting" processes are based on emails today (well, other than > >patches which go through gerrit). > >(we vote on infra on "technical" repo aspects, say here, since this repo > >is part of the reports subprojects, same for java-sdk). but for a new > >repo/subproject/concept, we actually go through the board mailing list. I see where you are going. From the Infra point of view, should we decide if a request for a repo is reasonable? Developers know if they need them, the Board is the decider if something is outside of a simple repo request, such as the net-new repo/subproject/concept you mention. By this I mean, I don't think there is any voting to be done by the team. By the time a request comes to the Infra team, should it already be vetted as reasonable and needed?