Re: [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master (ovirt-engine) ] [ 18-10-2018 ] [ 002_bootstrap.add_hosts ]

openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I see results. thanks, Dafna On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help > with the tagging issue > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Any updates, still failing? >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> adding sandron >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < >>> mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using >>>> openvswitch2.9 and >>>> > not 2.10 >>>> > is that package bump merged? >>>> >>>> No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue >>>> in >>>> >> > upgrade >>>> >> > I do see that >>>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >>>> >> > has >>>> >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and >>>> dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so >>>> >> > hope >>>> >> > it would grab the correct one. >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. >>>> >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the >>>> >> latest one available. >>>> >> >>>> >> Fingers crossed. >>>> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>> >> > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >> > Hi, >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >>>> >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk >>>> deps. >>>> >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are >>>> some >>>> >> >> > issues >>>> >> >> > with dependencies. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can >>>> you >>>> >> >> > please >>>> >> >> > update on the issue? >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > full log is here; >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >>>> >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Thanks, >>>> >> >> > Dafna >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Hi all, >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk >>>> libraries, >>>> >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >>>> >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us >>>> dpdk >>>> >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not >>>> openvswitch 2.9 >>>> >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in >>>> the >>>> >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch >>>> because >>>> >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >>>> >> >> *extras*. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 >>>> with >>>> >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using >>>> ovs-2.10 >>>> >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log >>>> - at >>>> >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we >>>> want to >>>> >> >> deliver: >>>> >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >>>> >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from >>>> centos >>>> >> >> extra packages >>>> >>>> @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump >>>> the ovs version >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >>>> >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >>>> >> >> [2] - >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >>>> >> >> [3] - >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >>>> >> >> [4] - >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exp... >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> GALIT ROSENTHAL >> >> SOFTWARE ENGINEER >> >> Red Hat >> >> <https://www.redhat.com/> >> >> galit(a)gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 >> <https://red.ht/sig> >> >