22 Oct
2018
22 Oct
'18
6:53 p.m.
I'm back at the office tomorrow, let me know if anything else else is needed. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:34 Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: > openvswitch2.10 was tagged and Gal just merged: > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ > > I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I > see results. > > thanks, > Dafna > > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: > >> sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help >> with the tagging issue >> >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Any updates, still failing? >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> adding sandron >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso < >>>> mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> > my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using >>>>> openvswitch2.9 and >>>>> > not 2.10 >>>>> > is that package bump merged? >>>>> >>>>> No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>>> > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue >>>>> in >>>>> >> > upgrade >>>>> >> > I do see that >>>>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ >>>>> >> > has >>>>> >> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and >>>>> dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so >>>>> >> > hope >>>>> >> > it would grab the correct one. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. >>>>> >> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the >>>>> >> latest one available. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Fingers crossed. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >>>>> >> > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >> > Hi, >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. >>>>> >> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk >>>>> deps. >>>>> >> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are >>>>> some >>>>> >> >> > issues >>>>> >> >> > with dependencies. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can >>>>> you >>>>> >> >> > please >>>>> >> >> > update on the issue? >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > full log is here; >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifact/upgrade-from-release-suite.el7.x86_64/test_logs/upgrade-from-release-suite-master/post-002_bootstrap.py/ >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: >>>>> >> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Thanks, >>>>> >> >> > Dafna >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Hi all, >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk >>>>> libraries, >>>>> >> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current >>>>> >> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us >>>>> dpdk >>>>> >> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not >>>>> openvswitch 2.9 >>>>> >> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in >>>>> the >>>>> >> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch >>>>> because >>>>> >> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the >>>>> >> >> *extras*. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 >>>>> with >>>>> >> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using >>>>> ovs-2.10 >>>>> >> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log >>>>> - at >>>>> >> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we >>>>> want to >>>>> >> >> deliver: >>>>> >> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig >>>>> >> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from >>>>> centos >>>>> >> >> extra packages >>>>> >>>>> @Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump >>>>> the ovs version >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364 >>>>> >> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/ >>>>> >> >> [2] - >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/ >>>>> >> >> [3] - >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/ >>>>> >> >> [4] - >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exported-artifacts/test_logs/upgrade-from-release-suite-master/post-002_bootstrap.py/lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0/_var_log/yum.log >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> GALIT ROSENTHAL >>> >>> SOFTWARE ENGINEER >>> >>> Red Hat >>> >>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>> >>> galit@gmail.com T: 972-9-7692230 >>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>> >>