Re: Infrastructure merit & barriers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/13/2011 11:52 PM, Ofer Schreiber wrote: > I don't mind taking care of mailman administration. Great, thanks! I have an sshkey from you already, so I can setup the access later today. Folks on this list, we have some things to think about: 1. What is a good process for bringing on new system administrators? Meaning, since we're giving limited-to-full sudo access, we want appropriate barriers in place so we can create the trust before we give out the keys. In Ofer's case, the trust exists by being part of the original RHEV team. :) So at a minimum we should extend that same courtesy to people from our various organizations - anyone can gain an entry via organizational association. 2. What are ways to get proof that people are able to do the job? We all like to think we know how to admin our Linux systems, but doing it for a project moves from "my laptop is broken, darn it" to "the servers are broken and the mission is in peril, oops." Think of this as, "What is the merit in a meritocratic Infrastructure team?" In the Fedora Project, new people to the Infrastructure team go through a probation period. They are given one or a few relatively minor tasks - ones that must be done according to the established procedures, but not anything that will break important systems in the event of a mistake. Success in those tasks helps someone get on to a specific team that handles a sub-system of the overall infrastructure. Any other ideas on how to handle establishing merit?