Re: [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt master (ovirt-engine) ] [ 18-10-2018 ] [ 002_bootstrap.add_hosts ]

my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and not 2.10 is that package bump merged?

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in > > upgrade > > I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ > > has > > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so > > hope > > it would grab the correct one. > > > > I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works. > That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the > latest one available. > > Fingers crossed. > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso > > <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite. > >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps. > >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some > >> > issues > >> > with dependencies. > >> > > >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you > >> > please > >> > update on the issue? > >> > > >> > full log is here; > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/arti... > >> > > >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge: > >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/ > >> > > >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Dafna > >> > > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal. > >> > >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries, > >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo. > >> > >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current > >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk > >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that. > >> > >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9 > >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the > >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because > >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the > >> *extras*. > >> > >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with > >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully. > >> > >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10 > >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at > >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed. > >> > >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to > >> deliver: > >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig > >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos > >> extra packages