4:44 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
------enig2WMMICWCKSOHIQPQDEIRQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
We are having a space issue again on resources.ovirt.org with the free
space, so I have deleted the older backup we had from gerrit as a
temporary measure (it will be regenerated again).
I've found that we have a deflated backup of the gerrit src directory,
that takes 28GB of space, the question is, are we using it? Do we need
it? If we do not we can just delete it (as we already have compressed
backups for it).
--=20
David Caro
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purky=C5=88ova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
RHT Global #: 82-62605
------enig2WMMICWCKSOHIQPQDEIRQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR7oijAAoJEEBxx+HSYmnD41AH/imtWGdmX33aWEX9ajYX8t2V
ZzQ24xAqcwPNeJN2DTDcgJEvkDFIvAmGEORowAsPGbOyTTHikOU9NOy21LsaC3ah
QYbQF402kz7Z9dxn/4D0qmPZPiEXpWxkeXvlTy7/ZNEW/ymCxicx+LrQID+31bGt
/5+No4fcM64Ux+DXeUKO8xasVbNVcY+WzfzIHO9/nWNSr7zz52MPRZiPvn96wezJ
pHP1M38O0OQYcBmk9607rH9IiIoZEkix7rNUDRdu8bdbXd5DX9lcwJKjEd6eaJYn
m2YiiIfWbbnsO7wLUakjHuOFW4xWoRPdDMZL+rDdY6vLQWh3zNmeOpM2vCyIRm8=
=vX0r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------enig2WMMICWCKSOHIQPQDEIRQ--
5:34 p.m.
16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in linode01,
under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and
gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed)
16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwade
on this - he set it up iirc)
16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup
16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought
16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingly
All the roads lead to quaid.
All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflated?
Or can we remove that?
All in all, is there a difference on the backups in
gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with
gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, David Caro <dcaroest(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
We are having a space issue again on resources.ovirt.org with the free
space, so I have deleted the older backup we had from gerrit as a
temporary measure (it will be regenerated again).
I've found that we have a deflated backup of the gerrit src directory,
that takes 28GB of space, the question is, are we using it? Do we need
it? If we do not we can just delete it (as we already have compressed
backups for it).
--
David Caro
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
RHT Global #: 82-62605
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
--
/Alexander Rydekull
8:22 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 07/23/2013 07:34 AM, Alexander Rydekull wrote:
16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in
linode01,
under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and
gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed)
16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwa=
de
on this - he set it up iirc)
16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup
16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought
16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingl=
y
=20
All the roads lead to quaid.
=20
All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflate=
d?
Or can we remove that?
All in all, is there a difference on the backups in
gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with
gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup?
Heh, I didn't know we had an uncompressed backup going there too. It was
something we set up on the fly way-back-when, and I haven't messed with
it. If we have a safe compressed backup, let's blow away the
uncompressed backup. Let me know when I can return the space to Linode.
- Karsten
--=20
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
--IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iD8DBQFR7ru92ZIOBq0ODEERAns9AJ0YsTbJq0DmHxEuXWUCsXgFpSj5cgCfcX6I
Iwsbl4sWPv3r0hHTmVqIHv4=
=7Hy3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA--
10:27 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--2T2P5nIjcqwxpKiC2R0jbuu4q2dv1Bosq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 07/23/2013 07:34 AM, Alexander Rydekull wrote:
16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in
linode01,
under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and
gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed)
16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwa=
de
on this - he set it up iirc)
16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup
16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought
16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingl=
y
=20
All the roads lead to quaid.
=20
All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflate=
d?
Or can we remove that?
All in all, is there a difference on the backups in
gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with
gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup?
Also, be sure to disconnect the backup itself, I think it's run as a
cronjob on the gerrit server? I don't see any sign of it in the crontab
of root or gerrit-backup, nor in /etc/cron.* ...
- Karsten
--=20
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
--2T2P5nIjcqwxpKiC2R0jbuu4q2dv1Bosq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iD8DBQFR7tky2ZIOBq0ODEERAmkLAJwLzZUd+VtvgQioYYkhQHO3txaLXwCdHPPp
FeT1e0t9JiWftOIta2lZMDI=
=athu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2T2P5nIjcqwxpKiC2R0jbuu4q2dv1Bosq--
4140
days inactive
4140
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexander Rydekull -
David Caro -
Karsten 'quaid' Wade