About gerrit backups and space on resources.ovirt.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2WMMICWCKSOHIQPQDEIRQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, We are having a space issue again on resources.ovirt.org with the free space, so I have deleted the older backup we had from gerrit as a temporary measure (it will be regenerated again). I've found that we have a deflated backup of the gerrit src directory, that takes 28GB of space, the question is, are we using it? Do we need it? If we do not we can just delete it (as we already have compressed backups for it). --=20 David Caro Red Hat Czech s.r.o. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purky=C5=88ova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic RHT Global #: 82-62605 ------enig2WMMICWCKSOHIQPQDEIRQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR7oijAAoJEEBxx+HSYmnD41AH/imtWGdmX33aWEX9ajYX8t2V ZzQ24xAqcwPNeJN2DTDcgJEvkDFIvAmGEORowAsPGbOyTTHikOU9NOy21LsaC3ah QYbQF402kz7Z9dxn/4D0qmPZPiEXpWxkeXvlTy7/ZNEW/ymCxicx+LrQID+31bGt /5+No4fcM64Ux+DXeUKO8xasVbNVcY+WzfzIHO9/nWNSr7zz52MPRZiPvn96wezJ pHP1M38O0OQYcBmk9607rH9IiIoZEkix7rNUDRdu8bdbXd5DX9lcwJKjEd6eaJYn m2YiiIfWbbnsO7wLUakjHuOFW4xWoRPdDMZL+rDdY6vLQWh3zNmeOpM2vCyIRm8= =vX0r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2WMMICWCKSOHIQPQDEIRQ--
16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in linode01, under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed) 16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwade on this - he set it up iirc) 16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup 16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought 16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingly All the roads lead to quaid. All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflated? Or can we remove that? All in all, is there a difference on the backups in gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup? On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, David Caro <dcaroest@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
We are having a space issue again on resources.ovirt.org with the free space, so I have deleted the older backup we had from gerrit as a temporary measure (it will be regenerated again).
I've found that we have a deflated backup of the gerrit src directory, that takes 28GB of space, the question is, are we using it? Do we need it? If we do not we can just delete it (as we already have compressed backups for it).
-- David Caro
Red Hat Czech s.r.o. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic RHT Global #: 82-62605
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
-- /Alexander Rydekull
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/23/2013 07:34 AM, Alexander Rydekull wrote:
16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in linode01, under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed) 16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwa= de on this - he set it up iirc) 16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup 16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought 16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingl= y =20 All the roads lead to quaid. =20 All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflate= d? Or can we remove that? All in all, is there a difference on the backups in gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup?
Heh, I didn't know we had an uncompressed backup going there too. It was something we set up on the fly way-back-when, and I haven't messed with it. If we have a safe compressed backup, let's blow away the uncompressed backup. Let me know when I can return the space to Linode. - Karsten --=20 Karsten 'quaid' Wade http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 --IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iD8DBQFR7ru92ZIOBq0ODEERAns9AJ0YsTbJq0DmHxEuXWUCsXgFpSj5cgCfcX6I Iwsbl4sWPv3r0hHTmVqIHv4= =7Hy3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IepA9sUgXE8t6WciLjxxuu2EDHJrnsEiA--
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --2T2P5nIjcqwxpKiC2R0jbuu4q2dv1Bosq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/23/2013 07:34 AM, Alexander Rydekull wrote:
16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in linode01, under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed) 16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwa= de on this - he set it up iirc) 16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup 16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought 16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingl= y =20 All the roads lead to quaid. =20 All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflate= d? Or can we remove that? All in all, is there a difference on the backups in gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup?
Also, be sure to disconnect the backup itself, I think it's run as a cronjob on the gerrit server? I don't see any sign of it in the crontab of root or gerrit-backup, nor in /etc/cron.* ... - Karsten --=20 Karsten 'quaid' Wade http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 --2T2P5nIjcqwxpKiC2R0jbuu4q2dv1Bosq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iD8DBQFR7tky2ZIOBq0ODEERAmkLAJwLzZUd+VtvgQioYYkhQHO3txaLXwCdHPPp FeT1e0t9JiWftOIta2lZMDI= =athu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2T2P5nIjcqwxpKiC2R0jbuu4q2dv1Bosq--
participants (3)
-
Alexander Rydekull -
David Caro -
Karsten 'quaid' Wade