Need a new gerrit repo for ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm
As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt Node to communicate with oVirt Engine [2]. In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also need consensus on a name. Name proposal: ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm ovirt-node-plugin-engine ovirt-engine-node-plugin I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include the arch@ list to get feedback. Thanks Mike [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin
On 05/17/2013 07:31 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt Node to communicate with oVirt Engine [2].
In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also need consensus on a name.
Name proposal: ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm I would go with that one.
I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include the arch@ list to get feedback.
Thanks
Mike
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
-- Cheers Douglas
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:02:34AM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 05/17/2013 07:31 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt Node to communicate with oVirt Engine [2].
In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also need consensus on a name.
Name proposal: ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm I would go with that one.
me2, though I do not have a strong opinion or explanation.
I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include the arch@ list to get feedback.
Thanks
Mike
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin
On 05/19/2013 08:21 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:02:34AM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 05/17/2013 07:31 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt Node to communicate with oVirt Engine [2].
In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also need consensus on a name.
Name proposal: ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm I would go with that one.
me2, though I do not have a strong opinion or explanation.
ok, let's go with that. I've already posted initial test packages on ovirt.org[1] with that name, so let's just go with that. Mike [1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/node-base/beta/rpm/Fedora/18/noarch/
I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include the arch@ list to get feedback.
Thanks
Mike
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On 05/20/2013 04:11 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 05/19/2013 08:21 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:02:34AM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 05/17/2013 07:31 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt Node to communicate with oVirt Engine [2].
In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also need consensus on a name.
Name proposal: ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm I would go with that one.
me2, though I do not have a strong opinion or explanation.
ok, let's go with that. I've already posted initial test packages on ovirt.org[1] with that name, so let's just go with that.
repo created. mike - you currently have +2/merge rights.
Mike
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/node-base/beta/rpm/Fedora/18/noarch/
I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include the arch@ list to get feedback.
Thanks
Mike
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
On 05/20/2013 03:05 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/20/2013 04:11 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 05/19/2013 08:21 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:02:34AM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 05/17/2013 07:31 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt Node to communicate with oVirt Engine [2].
In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also need consensus on a name.
Name proposal: ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm I would go with that one.
me2, though I do not have a strong opinion or explanation.
ok, let's go with that. I've already posted initial test packages on ovirt.org[1] with that name, so let's just go with that.
repo created. mike - you currently have +2/merge rights.
Can you give me push rights, too, so I can upload the initial code? Mike
Mike
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/node-base/beta/rpm/Fedora/18/noarch/
I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include the arch@ list to get feedback.
Thanks
Mike
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On 05/20/2013 10:41 PM, Mike Burns wrote: ...
ok, let's go with that. I've already posted initial test packages on ovirt.org[1] with that name, so let's just go with that.
repo created. mike - you currently have +2/merge rights.
Can you give me push rights, too, so I can upload the initial code?
done.
participants (4)
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Douglas Schilling Landgraf -
Itamar Heim -
Mike Burns