----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karsten (quaid) Wade" <quaid(a)iquaid.org>
> To: "infra" <infra(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:34:00 PM
> Subject: Task tracker
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Speak up if you disagree, but we could sure use a task tracker for
> the
> Infra team.
>
seems like the best option for now, we're using Trac & Redmine mostly
in rhevm.
and since this trac instance is up and running, i don't see a reason
why not to start using it.
seems like trac supports import/export of tickets [1] so it
shouldn't be a problem to migrate in the future
to a different tracker.
+1
[1]
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracImport
+1 on using this at least to start. Not ideal, given that it's not
ovirt.org domain,
but working right now wins in my book.
We should keep our eyes/ears open for other solutions though.
Side comment, if we want to deploy our own, it could be a good POC for someone looking to
join the infra team.
> One idea Mike suggested is, this Trac instance is gathering dust
> and
> available to take over (and re-customize):
>
>
https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt
>
> We could start using this immediately, and switch in the future. It
> is
> Trac, I've had varied experience with it; I know how to admin it
> fairly well, and we can customize it to this team with minimal
> effort.
> (Nice to not have to invest too much in making a workflow.) My
> biggest
> concern right now would be running at a larger scale - what happens
> over time? What happens if other project teams want an integrated
> task
> tracker? (The latter would make project management and getting an
> organized release out the door easier.)
>
> I looked around at the current state of FOSS tools that are offered
> as
> a service, and didn't get too excited.
>
>
http://www.hostedredmine.com/
>
https://ovirt-infra.teamlab.com
>
> I've also looked at
teambox.com in the past, but their no-cost
> services are limited. (They also haven't released any timeline or
> roadmap about open sourcing the latest version, the older versions
> are
> FOSS; I haven't looked at what it would take to run the service
> ourselves.)
>
> There are several services that are FOSS and we could run
> ourselves,
> such as the above Trac and Redmine.
>
> I strongly urge us to avoid using services that are not FOSS. There
> are many competitive ones in the proprietary markets, and a few
> offer
> no-cost usage for open source projects. I get concerned about
> locking
> our data and workflows in to a particular vendor. I would rather
> pick
> the best-of FOSS and be a strong user to support more development
> on
> our choice. Unfortunately, this does limit our choices in what is
> offered as a service.
+1000
>
> - - Karsten
> - --
> Karsten 'quaid' Wade .....
http://iquaid.org ..... gpg key:
> AD0E0C41
>
http://Fairy-TaleFarm.com .......................... Urban
> homestead
>
http://MicahForCouncil.org ................ Your advocate on
> council
>
http://SantaCruzPedicab.com .......... Sensible local
> transportation
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iD8DBQFQQR+42ZIOBq0ODEERArIbAKCN/uF+rlc9oH7tq4JoGtiDVeeCCQCgtGbW
> yJUUOowWAbcH1Z1K8LnLkFs=
> =/muc
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
_______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra