This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --GsSb1og0adLnpGqr34egumIIrkO7dCuRq Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="poFXqUXXEt5M3aIvnQQrPwrLHgoRxLa7u"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYyBEZXF1w6huZXMgKER1Y2sp?= <duck@redhat.com> To: oVirt Infra <infra@ovirt.org> Message-ID: <ae475e41-1c34-fa20-ba86-cec3563a1e33@redhat.com> Subject: what's going on with support@ ? --poFXqUXXEt5M3aIvnQQrPwrLHgoRxLa7u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quack, So I do not understand the current setting of this address. Recently dell4242@hotmail.com mailed with a problem and it should be directed to the corresponding ML (https://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/support/), but this one has always been empty because there is an alias overriding it and redirecting to postmaster@, which in my opinion is really not what people would expect. support@ suggest help about oVirt itself, not the infra, that's why this person says: =C2=AB Running into an issue importing a export domain on ov= irt 4.1 . =C2=BB, so this has nothing to do with the job of postmaster. I think some clarification and cleanup is needed here. Should we reinstate the ML? or remove support@ altogether? or=E2=80=A6 \_o< --poFXqUXXEt5M3aIvnQQrPwrLHgoRxLa7u-- --GsSb1og0adLnpGqr34egumIIrkO7dCuRq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcpcqg+UmRT3yiF+BVen596wcRD8FAljH9NcACgkQVen596wc RD/jZQ//QpQYv7WFe8AtkEL0Q/OVGNdEa4LqA3vtxJ4WjxbAk0KaWsUdZvgUTdO6 /tqQcFLFJ+aPcZtSu01rpXvAigDHP1+4AAs+ickp6Wo2dY3x3C77s65YId+inbbQ mDTExUv8pUJ8C4jqivilujNyZrKsPe7YK2heqwM+lzDZKXt1q4LEhlgwEgUZDqXz aGwob0d5lii1A8UbVcaNyJyuEIbL8OFBzZ66wI762eVZ81DFAYgZxpEysj0iMdCG r7rCGTsnMekSAy5U/cqwEuy/0VD6oUEfxVDvmwltNIYCXFqi52cyTSyMUuNmeJty gI6N6xHHHG/lcg5h+3FqoU7do97vo482dBfWvJbwpm6ipNIStHi3KHEC5rrjQZlB B2AitIpxAtYlx07Re6cAdeCzQQ2DbWx/jNH3Sy3zz8RsNze+IEpN/XmF6dhZMg61 VxJx9CezF6WerZCni8fYke89kRaJSx1Wmbl2N0SRuOvIQcdBh2Qs3YJvokz+MV6B eRkO5ThEVEQhNp5L1Bx6OKlfB6sBgrJDhXAWdDIhPuebCxTl+fCz/o8pvnWE9WfB o724tfpIGoUA2uKoRVH1SCpkwObwkOlGxzAoR00590uSqooCG+73taU+3OSe+Czw AjgH74EzqAUF+IVlusmKUwd/6whb8XrXOTJfjvJXaGhMUhi7D20= =ys1h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GsSb1og0adLnpGqr34egumIIrkO7dCuRq--
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rpx2AfDcQb1H1037kfCVaRrs7qw8Ujh4U Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Lo0pxFLSJmNdsPGg1PBmqfv3OVe1E8HEN"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYyBEZXF1w6huZXMgKER1Y2sp?= <duck@redhat.com> To: oVirt Infra <infra@ovirt.org> Message-ID: <ee09bd0a-643f-7340-0e38-09ddf216dd14@redhat.com> Subject: Re: what's going on with (support|sales|info)@ ? References: <ae475e41-1c34-fa20-ba86-cec3563a1e33@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <ae475e41-1c34-fa20-ba86-cec3563a1e33@redhat.com> --Lo0pxFLSJmNdsPGg1PBmqfv3OVe1E8HEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quack again, Why is sales@ and info@ also going to postmaster??? I think info@ would better go to BKP, and sales@=E2=80=A6 removed maybe? \_o< --Lo0pxFLSJmNdsPGg1PBmqfv3OVe1E8HEN-- --rpx2AfDcQb1H1037kfCVaRrs7qw8Ujh4U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcpcqg+UmRT3yiF+BVen596wcRD8FAljH+BIACgkQVen596wc RD/l/Q/+I9aXFQ4n1LH6QWRHDwIjfnb2R9dP38xPLYtZMDQcL5HWUISfeVR6Ww7Q gfkt/n//Mw6/QgDRip3/egVaefRzKV1gCkOn0Q9efkwIdranYB3vKLeM6YKvwvKA S1ysUKmA9ycYwnSlfYWr7s0N5SAycTVJTlJwJP+SKa9q6fH1L0mnSAGqoOMYIzro P7H/gCMeth2ISWDpgA4s3hqaMKhcto/j0IlRjmv0nPgRKBwyEGfSe6P7bPmJkqZY SKLic8LMa12ppxcobIh0T0pTcQwGXna9zbLLuu2t1S5O7/iHLcql7LurxItnnffQ 7Z+j5sPsZ47K4bb4rJ/8DsiPzYkkw3/1RUAhoMoLecsuwxzXcS45ItVoncHqDzUD cQT0PAV6Js8O17n7/9YXDVa8xSsIYTULrzQ/vbIqMl+TS1b/4UOpA9fJk98gLWxF 4AtNhUWuGnFZ3oQWD7/qrnRPnXJoqUyGFVDZAvjN9yNePFICYoWHacbJM02R41TM jNxF2RQHdyjkhBdxZGL6w//9gduq2mNTRFrcCAWRJjAlNJASy8pAjxMZ86t73947 hqaEpem+y7TWme7z5/0E3dvPHFdDhUj4syDnzzPgS3szUmv8tS4btvuOWFEMCg2w T0W5FHmFhpridxiZfWAUP+OMLKB65WMKfM+bmAxCXBVU/JRi/KY= =yWKX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rpx2AfDcQb1H1037kfCVaRrs7qw8Ujh4U--
I have never heard of sales@ovirt.org or info@ovirt.org lists being used. You can remove sales and redirect info to infra@ovirt.org. e. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Marc Dequènes (Duck) <duck@redhat.com> wrote:
Quack again,
Why is sales@ and info@ also going to postmaster???
I think info@ would better go to BKP, and sales@… removed maybe?
\_o<
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
-- Eyal Edri Associate Manager RHV DevOps EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Red Hat Israel phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Marc Dequènes (Duck) <duck@redhat.com> wrote:
Quack,
So I do not understand the current setting of this address. Recently dell4242@hotmail.com mailed with a problem and it should be directed to the corresponding ML (https://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/support/), but this one has always been empty because there is an alias overriding it and redirecting to postmaster@, which in my opinion is really not what people would expect.
support@ suggest help about oVirt itself, not the infra, that's why this person says: « Running into an issue importing a export domain on ovirt 4.1 . », so this has nothing to do with the job of postmaster.
Might make sense to redirect it to both infra & users lists?
I think some clarification and cleanup is needed here. Should we reinstate the ML? or remove support@ altogether? or…
\_o<
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
-- Eyal Edri Associate Manager RHV DevOps EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Red Hat Israel phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
participants (2)
-
Eyal Edri -
Marc Dequènes (Duck)