This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with. Proposed Mission Statement: The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project. Thanks Robert
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project.
A few nits and reorganizations... The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Thanks Robert
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :)
Thanks Robert
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :) Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference between a professional manner and following accepted professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :) Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference between a professional manner and following accepted professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It seems to make it a bit wordy... The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:09 -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :) Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference between a professional manner and following accepted professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It seems to make it a bit wordy...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Fixing It -> Its The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:11:05PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:09 -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :) Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference between a professional manner and following accepted professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It seems to make it a bit wordy...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Fixing It -> Its
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Trimming it further: The infra team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:17:44PM +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:11:05PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:09 -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote: >This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was >talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for >feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I >tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission >statements of other projects and this is what I came up with. > >Proposed Mission Statement: > >The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure >team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's >project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of >system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to >contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :) Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference between a professional manner and following accepted professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It seems to make it a bit wordy...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Fixing It -> Its
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Trimming it further:
The infra team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
And with the comments from IRC: The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators and the open source way.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators and the open source way.
OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements. I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read "following accepted professional standards of the open source way." Perhaps: "The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted professional standards of system administrators." - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB 5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4= =u0no -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 07/10/2012 04:29 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators and the open source way. OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read "following accepted professional standards of the open source way." Perhaps:
"The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted professional standards of system administrators." What about:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following "The Open Source Way" and accepted professional standards of system administrators. That works for me. Thanks Robert
- - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB 5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4= =u0no -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On 07/10/2012 04:47 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:29 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators and the open source way. OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read "following accepted professional standards of the open source way." Perhaps:
"The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted professional standards of system administrators." What about:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following "The Open Source Way" and accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Another option is: The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the tenants of open source and accepted professional standards of system administrators.
That works for me.
Thanks Robert
- - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB 5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4= =u0no -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:42 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:47 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:29 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators and the open source way. OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read "following accepted professional standards of the open source way." Perhaps:
"The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted professional standards of system administrators." What about:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following "The Open Source Way" and accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Another option is:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the tenants of open source and accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Assuming you mean "tenets" instead of "tenants", I like this.
That works for me.
Thanks Robert
- - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB 5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4= =u0no -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On 07/10/2012 05:42 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:47 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:29 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators and the open source way. OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read "following accepted professional standards of the open source way." Perhaps:
"The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted professional standards of system administrators." What about:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following "The Open Source Way" and accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Another option is:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the tenants of open source and accepted professional standards of system administrators.
It helps to use the right word. :) The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following the tenets of open source and accepted professional standards of system administrators.
That works for me.
Thanks Robert
- - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB 5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4= =u0no -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
On 07/10/2012 04:17 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:11:05PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:09 -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote: > This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was > talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for > feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I > tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission > statements of other projects and this is what I came up with. > > Proposed Mission Statement: > > The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure > team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's > project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of > system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to > contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :) Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference between a professional manner and following accepted professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well. I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It seems to make it a bit wordy...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. Fixing It -> Its
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. Trimming it further:
The infra team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of system administrators. Incorporating in the suggestions from IRC and the thread.
The oVirt's infra team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure services by following accepted open standards of system administrators.
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/10/2012 12:58 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :) Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference between a professional manner and following accepted
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote: professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
I think we could possible drop the professional manner - that may be a mental barrier to people, "Oh, we can't be playful? This sounds so corporate. Etc." For example: "The oVirt Infrastructure (Infra) project is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following both accepted professional standards of system administrators and the open source way." The last bit is added to support our lack of a definition of "community services infrastructure", which I use to mean, "Follows the open source way in providing services - open, transparent, appropriately low/high barriers, common tools, avoid NIH, etc." Is "the open source way" sufficient without further explanation, or do we need: "... the open source way, meaning anyone is welcome to join the project and gain trust and access through merit." ... and now it doesn't sound like a mission anymore. Would it be too much to actually make a methodology part of the mission? I.e., teaching others to fish while fishing with them as a mission. - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFP/IxA2ZIOBq0ODEERAl3DAJ48n6NgZDTMNhEjkGwQZv5Vc351/gCggMcM or4FdV8udyUxspdlkqbRkSA= =Degf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 12:58 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to contribute to the oVirt project. A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of system administrators. I like that one better :) Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference between a professional manner and following accepted
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote: professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well. I think we could possible drop the professional manner - that may be a mental barrier to people, "Oh, we can't be playful? This sounds so corporate. Etc."
For example:
"The oVirt Infrastructure (Infra) project is a community services infrastructure team made up of volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure following both accepted professional standards of system administrators and the open source way." We are stating the community services that implies "in the open source way" so if you want open source in the mission statement we could tweak
The last bit is added to support our lack of a definition of "community services infrastructure", which I use to mean, "Follows the open source way in providing services - open, transparent, appropriately low/high barriers, common tools, avoid NIH, etc."
Is "the open source way" sufficient without further explanation, or do we need:
"... the open source way, meaning anyone is welcome to join the project and gain trust and access through merit." To long mission statements are short and sweet. Also getting off the
On 07/10/2012 04:10 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: the community services line. main focus running the infrastructure for the project.
... and now it doesn't sound like a mission anymore. Would it be too much to actually make a methodology part of the mission? I.e., teaching others to fish while fishing with them as a mission.
- - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/IxA2ZIOBq0ODEERAl3DAJ48n6NgZDTMNhEjkGwQZv5Vc351/gCggMcM or4FdV8udyUxspdlkqbRkSA= =Degf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
participants (4)
-
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden -
Karsten 'quaid' Wade -
Mike Burns -
Robert Middleswarth