On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 16:35 +0800, Sheldon wrote:
On 06/27/2014 10:23 PM, Christy Perez wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 08:41 +0800, Sheldon wrote:
>> On 06/27/2014 06:27 AM, Christy Perez wrote:
>>> Quick poll for adding support for
>>> <cpu>
>>> <topology sockets='1' cores='2'
threads='1'/>
>>> </cpu>
>> Affinity also support ?
>>
>> VCPU pinning to some physical
> Yes, all those should be added as well. The complexity in adding the
> right combinations, per-system feature validation, kinds of errors they
> might generate, etc., made me think that for now, it might be better to
> start with a smaller, more commonly used feature, and then add the
> others piece-wise in the same way. A more agile approach.
agree.
+1
>
>>> I know it would be nice to let users add it on a per-vm basis, but maybe
>>> it might be something that we'd rather just leave in the template only.
>>> Having it in the template only seems simpler when thinking about UI
>>> design, imo, but I'd love to hear what everyone else thinks.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - Christy
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kimchi-devel mailing list
>>> Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>