Am 06-03-2014 00:57, schrieb Christy Perez:
When I submitted this the first time, I think it was Cristian that
pointed out that a) the arch for the amd64 ones should be amd64, and
also, an x86 guest should be allowed to run on an x86_64 host. I must
have sent you an old version of my patch, and thought you had also read
those replies. I can forward you the e-mail when I find it. I just
searched for a while and can't. If someone else wants to send Rodrigo
that mail, or review this patch with those things in mind, that would be
much appreciated!
Exactly, Christy, thanks for reminding us!
I do not agree that we should filter the available templates/guests to
those that have the exact same architecture. Some of them are able to
run guests in different architectures (e.g. running x86 from an x86_64
guest).
For each arch, I think we should have a list of supported archs instead
of expecting it to be the same as the guest's.