Typical use case... I write a fancy bindings for wok RESTful APIs
say,
in Haskell (because yeah! ;-) ). For the given endpoint (let's say
/abc) there is a JSON response you get for the GET method. Everything
is working fine until wok developers figure out that with the changing
needs may be the JSON sent as a response by /abc GET might need to
change. At this point if our RESTful API supports versioning poor
Haskell loving engineers can still be sure that their bindings will
work properly while giving the flexibility to wok developers to change
the product with changing requirements.
With version or not, if users want to update to the newer Kimchi/wok
version they will need to update their application to use the new API
otherwise they will keep back on old version.
All that because we don't (and will not!) maintain old versions - as I
said before.
I understand the scenario but it only makes sense while taking track on
different versions simultaneously - which is not our case.
If you need to do that for other matters, you suggest to maintain one
branch per version and keep tracking on which patch to apply on each branch.
----- Original message -----
From: Aline Manera <alinefm(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sent by: kimchi-devel-bounces(a)ovirt.org
To: Chandra Shehkhar Reddy Potula <chandra(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Kimchi-devel] [Proposal] Introducing the version in
REST API URI for kimchi/ginger plugins
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 12:03 AM
On 06/08/2015 07:41, Chandra Shehkhar Reddy Potula wrote:
> Hi Aline,
>
> No need to mention explicitly, but this is very useful in case
> where end users are exploiting functionality via REST API
> directly and not UI way.
I suppose end users know which version he/she is using, right? =)
>
> Regards
> Chandra
> On 08/06/2015 01:52 PM, Chandra Shehkhar Reddy Potula wrote:
>> Hi Aline,
>>
>> Versioning helps you iterate faster and prevents invalid
>> requests from hitting updated endpoints. It also helps smooth
>> transitions over any major API version as you can continue to
>> offer old API versions for a period of time. Definitely
>> supporting the old version of API period of time while offering
>> new functionality with newer version always give benefits and
>> extra time for end user to adjust to new one.
>>
>> I see lot of products in the market are adapting versioning (see
>> below link)
>>
http://www.lexicalscope.com/blog/2012/03/12/how-are-rest-apis-versioned/
>>
>> I do understand the concern of maintaining the version of the
>> API endpoints , below are some of the links from Openstack,
>> which talks about it.
>>
http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref.html
>>
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VersionDiscovery
>>
>> Hope it make senses to you.
>>
>> Regards
>> Chandra
>> On 08/06/2015 12:04 AM, Aline Manera wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chandra,
>>>
>>> I don't see any benefit in adding the version in the URL.
>>> Instead of that, it scares me on how we will maintain it.
>>>
>>> Once we move to wok and Kimchi as plugin, all the APIs will be
>>> automatically updated so everything will be in the same page.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Aline Manera
>>> On 17/07/2015 09:47, Chandra Sr Potula wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Kimchi/Ginger Devel-Team,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for creating WOK branch to separate the kimchi
>>>> plugin from the base frame work. It is a great idea.
>>>>
>>>> Along with the separation of kimchi plugin looks like there is
>>>> a transformation of REST API URIs as well. So thinking in
>>>> those lines will it be good idea even to introduce version to
>>>> the REST API URIs ?
>>>>
>>>> Let me take one REST API URI to convey clear on what I am
>>>> talking about.
>>>>
>>>> To retrieve the host repository information, current URI is:
>>>> "/plugins/kimchi/host/repositories".
>>>>
>>>> *Recommendation*:
>>>> New host repository URI can look like :
>>>> *"**/plugins/kimchi/v<version>/host/repositories" ,
*so that
>>>> it is easy to maintain REST API future enhancements at the
>>>> same time do not brake some body who is using the existing URI.
>>>>
>>>> Note* Adding version in the URI above is just an example and
>>>> we could place the version in the URI best possible way.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>> *Chandra Shekhar Reddy Potula*
>>>> Staff System Software Engineer
>>>> IBM Systems & Technology Group, Systems Software Development
>>>> System z Firmware Development
>>>>
>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *Phone:* 91-080-4066-0786 | *Mobile:* 91-973-1122-221
>>>> *E-mail:*_chandra.shekhar@in.ibm.com_
>>>> <mailto:chandra.shekhar@in.ibm.com>
>>>> IBM
>>>>
>>>> ORR, Manyatha MD3 1F B247
>>>> Bengaluru, Karnataka 560045
>>>> India
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kimchi-devel mailing list
>>>> Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Kimchi-devel@ovirt.org>
>>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kimchi-devel mailing list
>>> Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Kimchi-devel@ovirt.org>
>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kimchi-devel mailing list
>> Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Kimchi-devel@ovirt.org>
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel
_______________________________________________
Kimchi-devel mailing list
Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel