On 06/12/2017 09:37 PM, WK wrote:
OK, great.
If you need some testing done, let me know.
GlusterFS is really convenient and reliable in the small/medium HA
cluster space that Kimchi works well with.
Thanks! I keep you posted about any updated related to that. :-)
-bill
On 6/9/2017 8:33 AM, Aline Manera wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> There are a feature request open on github to make Kimchi support
> GlusterFS pool.
> It is not in the next releases plans but of course, patches are more
> than welcome.
>
> If I am not mistaken the subjects, I think there is someone
> interested on doing that as well. I would need to check the github
> issues to confirm that.
>
> Regards,
> Aline Manera
>
> On 06/06/2017 03:11 PM, WK wrote:
>> I am playing with GlusterFS on Kimchi (simple replication mount).
>>
>> Gluster has made a lot of improvements in the past year or so with
>> the introduction of 'sharding' which dramatically speeds up the
>> re-heal 'lock' time when you lose a brick.
>>
>> For now I am using the native mount (FUSE) and telling kimchi about
>> it using the DIR type. that works fine and is I believe how oVirt
>> supports Gluster.
>>
>> Then I plan on using the libgfapi mount which is supported by
>> Libvirt directly.
>>
>> Has the Kimchi client ever looked into supporting either the fuse
>> mount or libgfapi mount from the panel rather than hand doing it
>> with virsh?
>>
>> -bill
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kimchi-devel mailing list
>> Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel
>>
>