On 20-12-2014 05:49, gouzongmei(a)ourfuture.cn wrote:
From: Zongmei Gou <gouzongmei(a)ourfuture.cn>
---
src/kimchi/control/base.py | 13 ++++++++++---
src/kimchi/model/vms.py | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
src/kimchi/model/vmsnapshots.py | 8 ++++++--
src/kimchi/xmlutils/utils.py | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Thanks for the patch! It looks very nice written.
However, there are a few details which need to be fixed regarding
snapshots (e.g. the order the snapshots need to be recreated because of
parent/child relationship, setting back the current snapshot, among
other things). Also, we need to make sure the commands "make
check-local" (ensure formatting guidelines) and "make check" (run the
local tests) complete successfully before applying any new patch. There
are a few formatting issues with this patch which need to be updated,
and it's always good to add a test case which exploits the problem that
the patch fixes, so we don't hit it again in the future.
As I mentioned in a previous e-mail, I already have a patch which does
the snapshot handling but fails when reverting to a snapshot which was
created when the VM had a different name, due to the URL redirection
approach. AFAIK, that was the only problem with it and I didn't have to
look deeper to solve it. And your patch seems to fix that correctly (at
src/kimchi/control/base.py). Please, take a look at my patch at
https://github.com/cd1/kimchi/commit/20510e607e5f08ff6344fae3fbb0d84f324d...
and let me know what you think about it. I haven't sent it yet to this
mailing list because it's not completely finished, as I said.
Do you think we can fix this issue by submitting our patches separately
(i.e. you send the changes to src/kimchi/control/base.py and I send the
snapshot changes) or even by merging our patches together? It seems
we've already fixed this issue but in separate patches.