Re: [Kimchi-devel] [PATCH V2] Enhancement: PCI Device information enhancement

Hi Wen, It's a great patch, I tested it. I have just one inline comments. on 2014/10/27 15:42, Wen Wang wrote: > From: Wen Wang <wenwang(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt; > > V1 -> V2: > 1) Changed the API name to "getPCIDeviceCompanion". > 2) Changed for a more specific way of detecting the related devices. > 3) Added the "Affected devices" to the tip with aligned format. > 4) tip will when the pointer hang over any section of the affected line. > > This patch provide the way that shows more specific PCI device > information by hanging the mouse on top of device name. > > Signed-off-by: Wen Wang <wenwang(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt; > --- > ui/js/src/kimchi.api.js | 14 ++++++++++++++ > ui/js/src/kimchi.guest_edit_main.js | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ui/js/src/kimchi.api.js b/ui/js/src/kimchi.api.js > index 8a6e416..ebf826b 100644 > --- a/ui/js/src/kimchi.api.js > +++ b/ui/js/src/kimchi.api.js > @@ -1129,6 +1129,20 @@ var kimchi = { > }); > }, > > + getPCIDeviceCompanions : function(pcidev, suc, err) { > + kimchi.requestJSON({ > + url : kimchi.url + 'host/devices?_passthrough_affected_by=' + pcidev, > + type : 'GET', > + contentType : 'application/json', > + dataType : 'json', > + resend : true, > + success : suc, > + error : err ? err : function(data) { > + kimchi.message.error(data.responseJSON.reason); > + } > + }); > + }, > + > getISCSITargets : function(server, port, suc, err) { > server = encodeURIComponent(server); > port = port ? '&_server_port='+encodeURIComponent(port) : ''; > diff --git a/ui/js/src/kimchi.guest_edit_main.js b/ui/js/src/kimchi.guest_edit_main.js > index 030e112..2a9c1ab 100644 > --- a/ui/js/src/kimchi.guest_edit_main.js > +++ b/ui/js/src/kimchi.guest_edit_main.js > @@ -407,6 +407,31 @@ kimchi.guest_edit_main = function() { > }); > } > }); > + kimchi.getPCIDeviceCompanions(hostPCIs[i].name, function(infoData) { > + var pciTitle = ""; > + if(infoData.length>0) { I suggest that we move 'pciTitle += "Affected devices:\n";' here, and delete other occurrences of it in the for loop. If we put it in the for loop, we will get Affected devices dev1 Affected devices dev2 Affected devices dev3 If we put it outside the for loop, we will get Affected devices dev1 dev2 dev3 Maybe the latter way is better. > + for(var p=0; p<infoData.length; p++) { > + if(infoData[p].device_type === "net") { > + pciTitle += "Affected devices:\n"; > + pciTitle += infoData[p].name + "\n"; > + pciTitle += " " + "interface: " + infoData[p].interface; > + pciTitle += ", address: " + infoData[p].address; > + pciTitle += ", link_type: " + infoData[p].link_type + "\n"; > + } else if(infoData[p].device_type === "storage") { > + pciTitle += "Affected devices:\n"; > + pciTitle += infoData[p].name + "\n"; > + pciTitle += " " + "block: " + infoData[p].block; > + pciTitle += ", drive_type: " + infoData[p].drive_type; > + pciTitle += ", model: " + infoData[p].model + "\n"; > + } > + } > + for(var q=0; q<infoData.length; q++) { > + pciTitle === "" || $(".name", "#" + infoData[q].parent).attr("title", pciTitle); > + pciTitle === "" || $(".product", "#" + infoData[q].parent).attr("title", pciTitle); > + pciTitle === "" || $(".vendor", "#" + infoData[q].parent).attr("title", pciTitle); > + } > + } > + }); > } > }); > }); >