Backend return a list of objects, with name, path, size, etc. The list is usually sorted by name due to the architecture of get_list, lookup, etc. But here I want to sort by the path, which is the field shown in the UI. Thats why I sorted in the front end. Well, I think any other part of code is using HostPartition, so, I can rewrite its 'get' base method to sort like we want. Do you think its better ? On 03/26/2014 12:37 PM, Aline Manera wrote:
We usually do that on backend because of the better performance.
On 03/26/2014 11:10 AM, Rodrigo Trujillo wrote:
This patch sorts the output list of devices by their paths, improving the user experience.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Trujillo <rodrigo.trujillo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- ui/js/src/kimchi.storagepool_add_main.js | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/ui/js/src/kimchi.storagepool_add_main.js b/ui/js/src/kimchi.storagepool_add_main.js index f347747..7a751aa 100644 --- a/ui/js/src/kimchi.storagepool_add_main.js +++ b/ui/js/src/kimchi.storagepool_add_main.js @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ kimchi.initStorageAddPage = function() { kimchi.listHostPartitions(function(data) { if (data.length > 0) { var deviceHtml = $('#partitionTmpl').html(); + data.sort(function (a, b){return a.path.localeCompare(b.path)}); var listHtml = ''; $.each(data, function(index, value) { if (value.type === 'part' || value.type === 'disk') {
_______________________________________________ Kimchi-devel mailing list Kimchi-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel