Am 27-02-2014 11:20, schrieb Rodrigo Trujillo:
Maybe the naming is wrong below.
The map key USER_ID actually
contains the user name, not the ID. That is
how the class User is already implemented. We can send another patch
later to rename it but that is not the scope of this patch.
You are passing the User ID and getpwnam expects the User name
No, I am passing the user name because, as you said, getpwnam expects a
user name.
I did not test the patch manually,
I did.
not sure if it will work.
It does :)
Same problem that before, because you are
passing the User name to User Class , which expects the User ID
No, it expects a
user name.
... If this work, then the name of
parameters should change
I agree. But in another patch. I am working on an existing
code which
has a variable named "userid" containing a user name.