Hmmm what pep8 rules does this specific code violates? On 08/17/2016 04:21 PM, Ramon Medeiros wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ramon Medeiros <ramonn@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- tests/test_model.py | 29 ++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/test_model.py b/tests/test_model.py index 27225f8..09821b1 100644 --- a/tests/test_model.py +++ b/tests/test_model.py @@ -466,12 +466,9 @@ class ModelTests(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual(fw_manager.opened_ports, {})
mock_run_cmd.assert_has_calls( - [ - call(['firewall-cmd', '--state', '-q']), - call(['firewall-cmd', '--add-port=5905/tcp']), - call(['firewall-cmd', '--remove-port=5905/tcp']) - ] - ) + [call(['firewall-cmd', '--state', '-q']), + call(['firewall-cmd', '--add-port=5905/tcp']), + call(['firewall-cmd', '--remove-port=5905/tcp'])])
@mock.patch('wok.plugins.kimchi.model.virtviewerfile.run_command') def test_firewall_provider_ufw(self, mock_run_cmd): @@ -487,13 +484,10 @@ class ModelTests(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual(fw_manager.opened_ports, {})
mock_run_cmd.assert_has_calls( - [ - call(['firewall-cmd', '--state', '-q']), - call(['ufw', 'status']), - call(['ufw', 'allow', '5905/tcp']), - call(['ufw', 'deny', '5905/tcp']) - ] - ) + [call(['firewall-cmd', '--state', '-q']), + call(['ufw', 'status']), + call(['ufw', 'allow', '5905/tcp']), + call(['ufw', 'deny', '5905/tcp'])])
@mock.patch('wok.plugins.kimchi.model.virtviewerfile.run_command') def test_firewall_provider_iptables(self, mock_run_cmd): @@ -515,12 +509,9 @@ class ModelTests(unittest.TestCase): 5905, '-j', 'ACCEPT']
mock_run_cmd.assert_has_calls( - [ - call(['firewall-cmd', '--state', '-q']), - call(['ufw', 'status']), - call(iptables_add), call(iptables_del) - ] - ) + [call(['firewall-cmd', '--state', '-q']), + call(['ufw', 'status']), + call(iptables_add), call(iptables_del)])
@unittest.skipUnless(utils.running_as_root(), 'Must be run as root') @mock.patch('wok.plugins.kimchi.model.virtviewerfile.'