Hi Chirsty and Cristian,
thank you for point this problem. I found previous thread and I think
the concerns make sense.
I just have some points:
- The filter will not prevent user of running a x86 in a x86_64 machine,
he still can select a 32 bits iso manually and create the template.
- We don't have 32 iso listed, so the feature will not impact at this
time (of course, we can change this in future)
I am going to resend the patch =]
Rodrigo
On 03/06/2014 10:08 AM, CrÃstian Viana wrote:
Am 06-03-2014 00:57, schrieb Christy Perez:
> When I submitted this the first time, I think it was Cristian that
> pointed out that a) the arch for the amd64 ones should be amd64, and
> also, an x86 guest should be allowed to run on an x86_64 host. I must
> have sent you an old version of my patch, and thought you had also read
> those replies. I can forward you the e-mail when I find it. I just
> searched for a while and can't. If someone else wants to send Rodrigo
> that mail, or review this patch with those things in mind, that would be
> much appreciated!
Exactly, Christy, thanks for reminding us!
I do not agree that we should filter the available templates/guests to
those that have the exact same architecture. Some of them are able to
run guests in different architectures (e.g. running x86 from an x86_64
guest).
For each arch, I think we should have a list of supported archs
instead of expecting it to be the same as the guest's.
_______________________________________________
Kimchi-devel mailing list
Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel