Hi Chirsty and Cristian, thank you for point this problem. I found previous thread and I think the concerns make sense. I just have some points: - The filter will not prevent user of running a x86 in a x86_64 machine, he still can select a 32 bits iso manually and create the template. - We don't have 32 iso listed, so the feature will not impact at this time (of course, we can change this in future) I am going to resend the patch =] Rodrigo On 03/06/2014 10:08 AM, CrÃstian Viana wrote:
Am 06-03-2014 00:57, schrieb Christy Perez:
When I submitted this the first time, I think it was Cristian that pointed out that a) the arch for the amd64 ones should be amd64, and also, an x86 guest should be allowed to run on an x86_64 host. I must have sent you an old version of my patch, and thought you had also read those replies. I can forward you the e-mail when I find it. I just searched for a while and can't. If someone else wants to send Rodrigo that mail, or review this patch with those things in mind, that would be much appreciated! Exactly, Christy, thanks for reminding us!
I do not agree that we should filter the available templates/guests to those that have the exact same architecture. Some of them are able to run guests in different architectures (e.g. running x86 from an x86_64 guest).
For each arch, I think we should have a list of supported archs instead of expecting it to be the same as the guest's.
_______________________________________________ Kimchi-devel mailing list Kimchi-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel