On 21/01/2015 19:15, CrÃstian Viana wrote:
Reviewed-by: CrÃstian Viana <vianac(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
A few comments below:
On 20-01-2015 10:10, gouzongmei(a)ourfuture.cn wrote:
> From: Zongmei Gou <gouzongmei(a)ourfuture.cn>
>
> Hi, Cristian
>
> Thanks for your time on this, I've modified my patch according to
> your opinion,
> some problems may still exist.
>
> 1. The 'revert' function need return vm name recorded in the snapshot
> xml, not the snapshot
> name, so the "vir_snap.getName()" won't help.
You're right, we need the VM name there, not the snapshot name. So I
guess you could call "vir_dom.name()" instead of
"vir_snap.getXMLDesc() + xpath_get_text". I'm expecting that libvirt
will return the updated value when it changes. But you don't need to
send another revision of this patch just because of that, it already
works as it is.
> 4. For "test_rest", the snapshot revert function in mockmodel.py is
> different with the real model,
> which causes the response status different. So I just kept it, and
> all related test cases passed
> by now in my environment.
Now I see that we cannot create that specific test scenario in our
mockmodel, given its current implementation. Our MockSnapshot is too
simple, it isn't aware of the original VM's name (and many more
things), so unless we change our class MockSnapshot - which I don't
think it's worth it now - we cannot reproduce that issue. So we can
keep it as it is now, as you proposed.
What are the consequences on it when running Kimchi on test mode?
_______________________________________________
Kimchi-devel mailing list
Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel