On 2014?10?10? 19:11, Wen Wang wrote: The box line under "General" and other tabs feels strange, a tab and its content need to be one entity, but this line breaks this integrity. I hope we can have a default value of 10 GB as the placeholder. And shall we add a pool type in Storage tab to make user more clear about type he intended to use? BTW, if it is iscsi pool, shall we pick volume in this page?

On 10/13/2014 06:14 PM, Royce Lv wrote: ACK Sure Sure Yeah. Sorry that I missed that. The main idea is to enable multiple disks from different storage pools to a template. That make sense. I am thinking is it possible that we add the function to add volumes to template whether it's iSCSI or not, I think that will meet our goal. In which way, I think *Move iSCSI/SCSI volume selection to VM creation instead of Template view(wenwang)* will not be needed since 1) it's consistent to have all the configuration set in template including the volumes now. 2) If we still want to choose iSCSI/SCSI volume when creating a guest, it looks weird since we enable multiple volumes to a guest and just adding iSCSI/SCSI when creating a guest might be confusing the users. -- ======================================================= Best Regards Wang Wen

On 10/14/2014 01:49 AM, Aline Manera wrote: I am thinking is it possible that we add the function to add volumes to"Edit Template" whether it's iSCSI or not, I think that will meet our goal. In which way, I think *Move iSCSI/SCSI volume selection to VM creation instead of Template view(wenwang)* will not be needed since 1) it's consistent to have all the configuration set in template including the volumes now. 2) If we still want to choose iSCSI/SCSI volume when creating a guest, it looks weird since we enable multiple volumes to a guest and just adding iSCSI/SCSI when creating a guest might be confusing the users. > In addition to comments in the previous mail: > - As we will follow the same design on "Edit guest" let's keep the UI > style the same. Specially on "Storage" and "Network" tabs for input > and combo box styles. Sure for the input box. But we don't have combobox in "Edit guest", do you think we should keep this style or we can use a simple one. Besides the one I posted, there are two choices of the combobox that can be chosen: Those two looks light weighted. Kimchi is using the one in the mock up and ginger is using the right one above. For the consistance concern, I prefer one in the mock up but I am open for comments and suggestions. ACK > On 10/10/2014 08:11 AM, Wen Wang wrote: >> FYI, >>> This is the new design of the "Edit Template" dialogue. >>>>>>> Any comment is welcomed. >>> Best Regards >> Wang Wen >>>> _______________________________________________ >> Kimchi-devel mailing list >> Kimchi-devel(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/kimchi-devel -- ======================================================= Best Regards Wang Wen

On 10/14/2014 7:38 PM, Aline Manera wrote: ACK ACK

Good catch Cristian. This is only a quick mock up and your consideration is very helpful. I will make it consistent in the patches. Thanks Wang Wen On 10/14/2014 9:59 PM, Crístian Viana wrote: