Hi Archana,
On 11/03/2016 02:02 PM, Archana Singh wrote:
Hi Aline,
The testcases are failing even without this patch applied. Could you
please check if the testcases are failing for you too without this
patch applied.
No! The tests only fail with this patch set applied. Without it, only a
test on tests_rest.py fails.
Thanks,
Archana Singh
On 10/28/2016 07:26 PM, Aline Manera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some tests are failing with this patch:
>
> ***** Running unit test: test_template... FAILED
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_customized_network (test_template.TemplateTests)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "test_template.py", line 397, in test_customized_network
> self.assertEquals(200, resp.status)
> AssertionError: 200 != 500
>
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_customized_storagepool (test_template.TemplateTests)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "test_template.py", line 459, in test_customized_storagepool
> self.assertEquals(200, resp.status)
> AssertionError: 200 != 500
>
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_customized_tmpl (test_template.TemplateTests)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "test_template.py", line 212, in test_customized_tmpl
> self.assertEquals(200, resp.status)
> AssertionError: 200 != 500
>
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_tmpl_integrity (test_template.TemplateTests)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "test_template.py", line 516, in test_tmpl_integrity
> self.assertEquals(204, resp.status)
> AssertionError: 204 != 400
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 5 tests in 4.866s
>
>
>
> On 10/23/2016 10:38 AM, archus(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>> From: Archana Singh <archus(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> If template name is change to update and the new template name to be
>> updated already exists then exception is raised stating name already
>> exists.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Archana Singh <archus(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> model/templates.py | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/model/templates.py b/model/templates.py
>> index c3e24e1..e5663ad 100644
>> --- a/model/templates.py
>> +++ b/model/templates.py
>> @@ -231,6 +231,14 @@ class TemplateModel(object):
>> def update(self, name, params):
>> edit_template = self.lookup(name)
>>
>> + # If new name is not same as existing name
>> + # and new name already exists: raise exception
>> + with self.objstore as session:
>> + if name != params['name'] \
>> + and params['name'] in
session.get_list('template'):
>> + raise InvalidOperation("KCHTMPL0001E",
>> + {'name':
params['name']})
>> +
>> # Valid interfaces
>> interfaces = params.get('interfaces', [])
>> validate_interfaces(interfaces)
>