-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/2011 12:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> If you are on this mailing list, then you aren't a neutral third
> party ;-)
Heh, oh, well, I was thinking of people who aren't on this list.[1]
> These things tend to take care of themselves. Give it a few
> months and I'm sure there will be a bigger page there. Consider
> it a metric of success for how well we get the word out :-)
OK, I'll try to share your optimism here. :)
Now I'll have to do some thinking about that as a metric ...
- - Karsten
[1] Mainly curious I guess - if your company works on 100 upstream
projects, does that mean no one from your company should edit the
associated Wikipedia page? I.e. is there an institutional bias
presumed, by association?
- --
name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect
team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership
uri:
http://communityleadershipteam.org
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org
gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFOvcfj2ZIOBq0ODEERAr8IAKCp4yaTHr7JHcmm+MidlvL2vPZ2twCeMjTk
CKFJVLt0lRxc+gQNog0CBms=
=0UWO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----