On 11/11/2011 02:30 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/2011 10:02 AM, Stewart, David C wrote:
Generally speaking, it's better to have a neutral 3rd party edit your wikipedia page, or it can bite you.
How about:
1. One or a few of us add new content to the Talk:OVirt page. 2. The rest of us look, comment, and help fix. 3. We ask via the Talk: mechanism for other page maintainers to approve the changes. 4. If no one replies, we can put out the word generally that we've got some good content to change and would any editor of Wikipedia look it over.
One challenge we have is, what is a neutral 3rd party? For example, if someone from Intel who doesn't work on oVirt made the changes, is that OK? Because I know a few editors who can help like that. :)
If you are on this mailing list, then you aren't a neutral third party ;-) These things tend to take care of themselves. Give it a few months and I'm sure there will be a bigger page there. Consider it a metric of success for how well we get the word out :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori
- - Karsten - -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect team: Red Hat Community Architecture& Leadership uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org http://TheOpenSourceWay.org gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFOvYXr2ZIOBq0ODEERAiJeAKCbJfCmSgqXafoULgfjpFm9+TCdwwCgvBpi ZTGn93G+F+6gKs3rgS8WTuU= =dXI3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Project-planning mailing list Project-planning@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning