Hi Carl - let me look into this on the Intel side. We're still talking Bay Area and
Nov 2 and 3, right?
-----Original Message-----
From: project-planning-bounces(a)ovirt.org [mailto:project-planning-
bounces(a)ovirt.org] On Behalf Of Carl Trieloff
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 12:13 PM
To: Sousou, Imad
Cc: project-planning(a)ovirt.org
Subject: Re: Location (for Cisco, IBM, Intel)
Kyle, Imad,
Any break through on location confirm from either Cisco or Intel?
Carl
On 09/12/2011 01:17 PM, Sousou, Imad wrote:
> Same here from intel
> Imad
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Sep 12, 2011, at 10:16 AM, "Michael D Day"
<mdday@us.ibm.com<mailto:mdday@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks Kyle for the update.
>> On 09/12/2011 12:54 PM, kmestery wrote:
>>> Carl:
>>>
>>> Still waiting on word internally on this, will see what I can do
>> today to get a decision one way or another.
> As a backup option in case this doesn't work out I'm investigating the
availability of an IBM facility in the Bay Area.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> Mike Day
> IBM Distinguished Engineer
> Chief Virtualization Architect, Open Systems Development
> Cell: +1 919 371-8786 | <mailto:mdday@us.ibm.com>
mdday@us.ibm.com<mailto:mdday@us.ibm.com>
> <
http://code.ncultra.org>http://code.ncultra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Project-planning mailing list
> Project-planning@ovirt.org<mailto:Project-planning@ovirt.org>
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning
_______________________________________________
Project-planning mailing list
Project-planning(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning