
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2011 12:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If you are on this mailing list, then you aren't a neutral third party ;-)
Heh, oh, well, I was thinking of people who aren't on this list.[1]
These things tend to take care of themselves. Give it a few months and I'm sure there will be a bigger page there. Consider it a metric of success for how well we get the word out :-)
OK, I'll try to share your optimism here. :) Now I'll have to do some thinking about that as a metric ... - - Karsten [1] Mainly curious I guess - if your company works on 100 upstream projects, does that mean no one from your company should edit the associated Wikipedia page? I.e. is there an institutional bias presumed, by association? - -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org http://TheOpenSourceWay.org gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFOvcfj2ZIOBq0ODEERAr8IAKCp4yaTHr7JHcmm+MidlvL2vPZ2twCeMjTk CKFJVLt0lRxc+gQNog0CBms= =0UWO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----