1:31 p.m.
I'm a full-time telecommuter and I really, really appreciate when
events are webcast (with archives.) Sometimes it's the only chance I
have to see and hear the voices behind important events.
So I have a vision that we _could_ webcast the first day of the
workshop.[1] There are a lot of ways to accomplish this, the least of
which is me setting up a camera, recording, and posting on the web
afterwards.
Are there any thoughts from you all about this?
For some of us, it may be the first time we're going to participate
publicly in such an open way, and I want to respect the concerns that
can come with that. I assure you that people watching really do
benefit and it will help your interactions in the future when stuck in
text mode on IRC and mailing lists. I'm also thinking of the rest of
the existing developer teams at our individual organizations - they
can't be at the workshop and benefit from seeing all of us, too.
I know this is a complication that could be very annoying for the
presenters and audience if we don't do it right.
So I'm asking you - as developers and technologists - what way do you
think?
- Karsten
[1] I figure webcasting the breakout sessions is more annoyance than
useful, although I'll be recommending using Etherpad and IRC for
collaborative documentation of breakouts; wiki is archive for
session notes. However, if you want to bring people in to your
session using videoconferencing, great. Maybe we can talk about
that possibility, too.
--
name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener
team: Red Hat Community Architecture & Leadership
uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org
gpg: AD0E0C41
2:02 p.m.
On 10/07/2011 01:31 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
I'm a full-time telecommuter and I really, really appreciate
when
events are webcast (with archives.) Sometimes it's the only chance I
have to see and hear the voices behind important events.
So I have a vision that we _could_ webcast the first day of the
workshop.[1] There are a lot of ways to accomplish this, the least of
which is me setting up a camera, recording, and posting on the web
afterwards.
Are there any thoughts from you all about this?
I'm not going to be able to attend the workshop so I'm very eager about having a
way to participate remotely.
I actually think video is not all that important as long as slide decks are made
available before hand. Audio is really what's important. There's a lot of ways
to stream audio (particularly, in real time).
For breakout sessions, projecting an IRC channel has worked well at past
conferences, in particular, when combined with streaming audio.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
For some of us, it may be the first time we're going to
participate
publicly in such an open way, and I want to respect the concerns that
can come with that. I assure you that people watching really do
benefit and it will help your interactions in the future when stuck in
text mode on IRC and mailing lists. I'm also thinking of the rest of
the existing developer teams at our individual organizations - they
can't be at the workshop and benefit from seeing all of us, too.
I know this is a complication that could be very annoying for the
presenters and audience if we don't do it right.
So I'm asking you - as developers and technologists - what way do you
think?
- Karsten
[1] I figure webcasting the breakout sessions is more annoyance than
useful, although I'll be recommending using Etherpad and IRC for
collaborative documentation of breakouts; wiki is archive for
session notes. However, if you want to bring people in to your
session using videoconferencing, great. Maybe we can talk about
that possibility, too.
_______________________________________________
Project-planning mailing list
Project-planning(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning
2:05 p.m.
We can setup a WebEx as well, which would allow us to share the presentations that way.
This would be voice as well, we could do video if someone had a video camera as well.
On Oct 7, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/07/2011 01:31 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
> I'm a full-time telecommuter and I really, really appreciate when
> events are webcast (with archives.) Sometimes it's the only chance I
> have to see and hear the voices behind important events.
>
> So I have a vision that we _could_ webcast the first day of the
> workshop.[1] There are a lot of ways to accomplish this, the least of
> which is me setting up a camera, recording, and posting on the web
> afterwards.
>
> Are there any thoughts from you all about this?
I'm not going to be able to attend the workshop so I'm very eager about having a
way to participate remotely.
I actually think video is not all that important as long as slide decks are made
available before hand. Audio is really what's important. There's a lot of ways
to stream audio (particularly, in real time).
For breakout sessions, projecting an IRC channel has worked well at past conferences, in
particular, when combined with streaming audio.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> For some of us, it may be the first time we're going to participate
> publicly in such an open way, and I want to respect the concerns that
> can come with that. I assure you that people watching really do
> benefit and it will help your interactions in the future when stuck in
> text mode on IRC and mailing lists. I'm also thinking of the rest of
> the existing developer teams at our individual organizations - they
> can't be at the workshop and benefit from seeing all of us, too.
>
> I know this is a complication that could be very annoying for the
> presenters and audience if we don't do it right.
>
> So I'm asking you - as developers and technologists - what way do you
> think?
>
> - Karsten
>
> [1] I figure webcasting the breakout sessions is more annoyance than
> useful, although I'll be recommending using Etherpad and IRC for
> collaborative documentation of breakouts; wiki is archive for
> session notes. However, if you want to bring people in to your
> session using videoconferencing, great. Maybe we can talk about
> that possibility, too.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Project-planning mailing list
> Project-planning(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning
_______________________________________________
Project-planning mailing list
Project-planning(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/project-planning
4592
days inactive
4592
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Anthony Liguori -
Karsten Wade -
kmestery