út 19. 2. 2019 v 12:47 odesílatel Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <
mdbarroso(a)redhat.com> napsal:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:41 PM Brian Wilson
<briwils2(a)cisco.com> wrote:
>
> It looked to continue to add them if looking at something like output
from "ip link".
>
> I was not however able to save the networks so the host always had
"Unsaved Network Changes".
>
> I eventually needed to use the host and rebooted it and since they
weren't saved they were all gone on reboot.
>
>
>
> So the takeaway i see here is that with Bridged Networks there is a
softlimit of ~350 in a Datacenter/Cluster due to the timeout of the VDSM.
"vdsTimeout"
>
> Is this something we could tune if we wanted have more than 350?
>
> Im trying to think of what would happen if we increased that to anything
else though.
I think Petr is the best person to theorize over this :)
+Petr Horacek , what are your thoughts on this matter?
I somehow lost this thread and saw it only now searching for something
completely unrelated. Anyway, if you are still interested the way to
increase the timeout is described here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193083#c54. I think it should
be fine to increase it, but I have no proof (test) for that.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/SUANWYTO727...