On Apr 16, 2017 7:01 AM, "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 4:17 AM Dan Yasny <dyasny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
When you set up a storage domain, you need to specify a host to
perform
the initial storage operations, but once the SD is defined, it's details
are in the engine database, and all the hosts get connected to it directly.
If the first host you used to define the SD goes down, all other hosts will
still remain connected and work. SPM is an HA service, and if the current
SPM host goes down, SPM gets started on another host in the DC. In short,
unless your actual NFS exporting host goes down, there is no outage.
There is no storage outage, but if you shutdown the spm host, the spm host
will not move to a new host until the spm host is online again, or you
confirm
manually that the spm host was rebooted.
In a properly configured setup the SBA should take care of that. That's the
whole point of HA services
Nir
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konrasko(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
> I see each host has direct connection nfs mount, but yes, if main host to
> which I connected nfs storage going down the storage becomes unavailable
> and all vms are down
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 10:37 AM FERNANDO FREDIANI <
> fernando.frediani(a)upx.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Konstantin.
>>
>> That doesn`t make much sense make a whole cluster depend on a single
>> host. From what I know any host talk directly to NFS Storage Array or
>> whatever other Shared Storage you have.
>> Have you tested that host going down if that affects the other with the
>> NFS mounted directlly in a NFS Storage array ?
>>
>> Fernando
>>
>> 2017-04-15 12:42 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konrasko(a)gmail.com>:
>>
>>> In ovirt you have to attach storage through specific host.
>>> If host goes down storage is not available.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:31 AM FERNANDO FREDIANI <
>>> fernando.frediani(a)upx.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, make it not go through host1 and dedicate a storage server for
>>>> running NFS and make both hosts connect to it.
>>>> In my view NFS is much easier to manage than any other type of
>>>> storage, specially FC and iSCSI and performance is pretty much the same,
so
>>>> you won`t get better results other than management going to other type.
>>>>
>>>> Fernando
>>>>
>>>> 2017-04-15 5:25 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi
<konrasko(a)gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>> I have one nfs storage,
>>>>> it's connected through host1.
>>>>> host2 also has access to it, I can easily migrate vms between them.
>>>>>
>>>>> The question is - if host1 is down - all infrastructure is down,
>>>>> since all traffic goes through host1,
>>>>> is there any way in oVirt to use redundant storage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Only glusterfs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users