I think he means SPM? I've seen when node with SPM goes down it isn't
really seamless and takes a minute or two to catch up unless of course you
out that node in maintenance mode but that isn't possible if it crashes or
something
On Apr 15, 2017 1:38 PM, "FERNANDO FREDIANI" <fernando.frediani(a)upx.com>
wrote:
Hello Konstantin.
That doesn`t make much sense make a whole cluster depend on a single host.
From what I know any host talk directly to NFS Storage Array or whatever
other Shared Storage you have.
Have you tested that host going down if that affects the other with the
NFS mounted directlly in a NFS Storage array ?
Fernando
2017-04-15 12:42 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konrasko(a)gmail.com>:
> In ovirt you have to attach storage through specific host.
> If host goes down storage is not available.
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:31 AM FERNANDO FREDIANI <
> fernando.frediani(a)upx.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, make it not go through host1 and dedicate a storage server for
>> running NFS and make both hosts connect to it.
>> In my view NFS is much easier to manage than any other type of storage,
>> specially FC and iSCSI and performance is pretty much the same, so you
>> won`t get better results other than management going to other type.
>>
>> Fernando
>>
>> 2017-04-15 5:25 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konrasko(a)gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I have one nfs storage,
>>> it's connected through host1.
>>> host2 also has access to it, I can easily migrate vms between them.
>>>
>>> The question is - if host1 is down - all infrastructure is down, since
>>> all traffic goes through host1,
>>> is there any way in oVirt to use redundant storage?
>>>
>>> Only glusterfs?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users