Maybe I missread, sorry. I interpreted that by design this was not a
feature and that it was not in any roadmap as current customers don't need
it, or at least I understood that from previous posts.
Happy to know this is planned to be a feature! :)
Again guys, thanks a lot for the help!
Sebastián Greco
IT Consultant
Cloud Computing - Red Hat - VMware - Zimbra
www.essiprojects.com
*www.essiprojects.co.uk <
http://www.essiprojects.co.uk>*
Pl. Prim, 4-5 Pral 2a · T:+34 977 221 182 · M: +34 619 985 161 F: +34 977
230 170 · 43001 Tarragona Spain
120 Pall Mall · T:+44 207 101 0778 · F: +44 843 538 3112 · SW1Y 5ED *London*
UK
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Sebastian Greco
<sgreco(a)essiprojects.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>
>> VMs are not
>> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
>
>
> Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from
RH
> points out that customers are not interested in this feature. While I
can't
> argue with that, what I do can say is that "non-customers" (most of
> companies out there using vsphere or hyper-v) feel dissapointed towards
this
> solution for things like this one (for this case, 2 of my customers are
> missing this, we are deploying RHV to one of them this week).
>
> I don't see how this lack of flexibility is something good, and so far
from
> my experience with customers which I'm trying to convince to start using
> RHV, when they finally do agree to start with one or two servers
(following
> the RHCI roadmap evolution to the hybrid cloud), they see things like
this
> and dismiss this solution sooner than later.
>
> Anyways, question has been answer "yes, is technically possible but by
> design it is not going to happen",
Not sure how you got this impression from current discussion. On the
contrary - people are working on this, and it was planned to be completed
in 4.0, but eventually postponed.
Best,
> and I wouldn't like to convert this
> thread or abuse your kindness deviating the subject :)
>
> Thx again guys for the help,
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
--
Didi