Re: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com>
To: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>, "Marek Grac"
<mgrac(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 1:45:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks(a)redhat.com>
> To: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 1:02:13 AM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents
>
> Hi all --
>
> I'm trying to get fencing squared away in my cluster of hp dl-380 servers,
> which come with ilo4. I was able to get a successful status check from
> the command line with fence_ilo4, but not w/ the ilo4 option in ovirt.
>
> I see, though, that ilo4 in ovirt just maps to fence_ipmilan, and I was
> not able to get a successful status check w/ fence_ipmilan from the cli.
>
> So, I tried resetting the mapping so that ilo4 maps to ilo4. Now I can
> complete the power management test in ovirt, but I imagine there's some
> reason why ovirt isn't configured this way by default.
>
> Will fencing actually work for me with ilo4 mapped to ilo4, rather than
> to ipmilan?
ILO3 and ILO4 are mapped implicitly to ipmilan with lanplus flag ON and
power_wait=4
On my installation, ilo4 w/ no options fails the test. ilo4 w/ lanplus=on
in the options field succeeds. Is it possible that the lanplus=on options
isn't being registered/applied properly?
Jason
If you change the mapping to use the native scripts its OK as long as
it
works for you
addin Marec G to the thread
Marec, should we always map ILO3 & ILO4 to the native scripts (fence_ilo3 ,
fence_ilo4) and not to ipmilan ???
>
> Thanks, Jason
>
> ---
>
> Jason Brooks
> Red Hat Open Source and Standards
>
> @jasonbrooks | @redhatopen
> http://community.redhat.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>