I tried a different Aproach: One VLAN for each NIC I tried but not works.... I left the Virtual Machine pinging the Gateway after 10 minutes I left my Worstation alone and I went back to my home. Today i see the ping working (¿?) Maybe I rush too much...or maybe not. I reboot the Virtual Machine, same problem: after 15 minutes the Machine can't reach the Gateway, we need HA and 10+ minutes it's not considerated. After a I mess my oVirt LAB, after trying everything. This my last working setup with sloooooooooow reaching of Gateway: DATA CENTERS Logical Networks: ----------- Name: ovirtmgmt Description: Management Network Network Label: 1 MTU: Default ----------- Name: dmz Description: VLAN 50 Network Label: 50 Enable VLAN tagging: 50 VM network MTU: Default ----------- Name: Hosting Description: VLAN 100 Network Label: 100 Enable VLAN tagging: 100 VM network MTU: Default ------------ CLUSTERS Logical Networks ovirtmgmt Assign Required Display Network Migration Network dmz Assign Hosting Assign Required HOSTS Name: srvovirt02.cnsc.net Hostname/IP: 192.168.0.63 Network Interfaces HOSTS BOND VLAN NETWORK NAME ADDRESS MAC SPEED(Mbps) RX(Mbps) TX(Mbps) eno1 * ovirtmgmt 192.168.0.63 00:17:a4:77:00:18 10000 < 1 < 1 eno2 eno2.50 (50) dmz 192.168.50.8 00:17:a4:77:00:1a 10000 < 1 < 1 ens1f0 ens1f0.100 (100) Hosting 192.168.100.7 00:17:a4:77:00:1c 10000 < 1 < 1 ens1f1 00:17:a4:77:00:1e 0 < 1 < 1 Setup Hosts Networks Network: ovirtmgmt Static IP: 192.168.0.63 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 192.168.0.1 Custom Properties: No available keys Sync network: Yes Network: dmz Static IP: 192.168.50.8 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224 Gateway: 192.168.50.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key... Network: Hosting Static IP: 192.168.100.7 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.240 Gateway: 192.168.100.1 Custom Properties: Please select a key... Virtual Machines Name: PruebaVLAN Host: srvovirt02.cnsc.net Edit Network Interface Name: nic1 Profile: dmz/dmz Type: VirtIO Custom MAC address: 00:00:1a:4a:3e:00 Link State: Up Card Status: Plugged Network Interfaces in the Host srvovirt02.cnsc.net: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 5: ens1f1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 72:f8:9c:75:e3:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 10: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master dmz state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:00:1a:4a:3e:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc00:1aff:fe4a:3e00/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 17: eno2.50@eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master dmz state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 18: dmz: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.50.8/27 brd 192.168.50.31 scope global dmz valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 19: ens1f0.100@ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master Hosting state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 20: Hosting: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.100.7/28 brd 192.168.100.15 scope global Hosting valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 21: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.63/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ovirtmgmt valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2015-06-30 21:34 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
You can count on it :)
2015-06-30 21:23 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
Let us know how it works out, I am curious to see if having a untagged and tagged interface on the same bridge was an issue. On Jun 30, 2015 10:21 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Donny, Tomorrow I'm going to try this. :)
2015-06-30 21:12 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
That tells me that there is a tagging issue between the host and the switch. Untagged traffic flows without issue via the same interface as tagged traffic. As a personal best practice I separate access ports(untagged) and trunk ports (tagged) traffic on different physical ports. Can you setup a separate phys interface for the tagged traffic, or must you be able to pass both on the same interface. On Jun 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
My mgmt network works wonderfully, Virtual Machines created on the mgmt even can reach Internet. But my company wants the traffic separated.
Thanks Donny, I'm a RHCSA from Colombia, but I'm learning about oVirt. (oVirt is a new thing in my country)
P.S : I want to put VMware in the Trash Can too. ^_ ^
2015-06-30 20:59 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:
There is a special place in my DC for vmware. TrashCan...lol On Jun 30, 2015 9:50 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm going to check it out... but how the host can reach the Gateway > and the Virtual Machine inside doesn't ? > > Donny you are very kind, this the last step to free my DataCenter > from VMware. > > 2015-06-30 20:46 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: > >> Does your switch have an IP on that vlan... I would step things out >> VM>host>switch>rtr >> >> You have already confirmed VM to host. >> >> I'm going to look at your screens again to make sure I didn't miss >> anything >> On Jun 30, 2015 9:42 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the explanation :) >>> >>> I set everything of the VLANs at oVirt, After I put a IP on the >>> Virtual Machine. But the Virtual Machine can't reach the gateway, The host >>> can do. The Virtual Machine only can reach the host. All the machines of >>> the range of net can reach the Virtual Machine. >>> >>> 2015-06-30 20:36 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>> >>>> I'm asking if your setting the vlan on the VM or at ovirt. >>>> >>>> More than likely if you are coming from VMware you have the Vlans >>>> set at the hypervisor. This does work in ovirt, I am doing it right now >>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:31 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mmmm I'm new in oVirt :( >>>>> >>>>> VMs Interface is Virtual MachineS Interface or VM Network >>>>> Interface in the host ? >>>>> >>>>> I configured the IP of the VLAN in the host. >>>>> >>>>> I double check: the NIC of the Host has the VLAN assigned. >>>>> >>>>> Can you help me ? >>>>> >>>>> 2015-06-30 20:11 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>> >>>>>> Are you configuring the vms interface with the vlan or tagging >>>>>> at the host. >>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 7:28 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Donny >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have HP Switches (HP 5406zl) and they are configurated on >>>>>>> trunk mode. (VMware is configurated to use that). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any suggestion ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your response. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2015-06-30 17:51 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vlans are layer 2, sounds like a tagging problem. Cisco >>>>>>>> switches? The tag sticks to the host bridge, but is being stripped off when >>>>>>>> it leaves the host.... Is your switch in access mode or trunk? >>>>>>>> Hi Friends of oVirt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm trying to migrate my company from VMware to oVirt. >>>>>>>> In my final tests, I set up 2 more VLANs in oVirt, (VM VLANs) >>>>>>>> The Virtual Machines in these VLANs, can be reached from the >>>>>>>> external IPs from the net range, >>>>>>>> but from the Virtual machines only can ping the Host with the >>>>>>>> Bridge and itself, can't reach the gateway. ¿? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I configured a IP Forwarding in the Host with the virtual >>>>>>>> machine, and nothing changes... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any idea ? This is the last duty before embrace oVirt in the >>>>>>>> company. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Look to the VLAN 100 configuration (My desired VM Network): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/7hrog0a2n/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/68b40i1vr/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/lu6mlshgp/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/540o1qc0t/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/4kyg787bt/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/v7ralh7zb/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/kn903cl03/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For any idea, thanks in advance >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >