Thanks for the response. If possible i would like to reduce the amount of tooling. We already have quite a lot. Do you think a single ovirt engine could cope? Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
Op 26 apr. 2016 om 14:19 heeft Alexander Wels <awels@redhat.com> het volgende geschreven:
On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:13:11 PM Joost@familiealbers.nl wrote: Hi all, i have a somewhat awkward requirement to deploy datacenters to around 500 satelite locations. Each datacenter will have 1 or 2 hypervisors and if 2 a cluster with glusterfs for shared storage will be deployed. I am expecting to run between 4 and 10 vms per data center. During operations it is expected 20% to 40% of the satelite locations will be down or have a very bad connection to the engine. I will still like to manage these datacenters from ovirt engine. Does anyone have any figures on how many datacenters i can add given what requirements for a single engine and perhaps some best practices for dealing with 'bad' connections between the hypervisors and the engine. Thanks a lot!
Sounds like a good use case for manage IQ. If possible I would do hosted engines in each satellite location, and then use manage IQ to manage the engines.
Alexander
ps. Vrolijk Koning dag morgen
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users