[ovirt-users] iSCSI and multipath

Hi, Context here : - 2 setups (2 datacenters) in oVirt 3.4.1 with CentOS 6.4 and 6.5 hosts - connected to some LUNs in iSCSI on a dedicated physical network Every host has two interfaces used for management and end-user LAN activity. Every host also have 4 additional NICs dedicated to the iSCSI network. Those 4 NICs were setup from the oVirt web GUI in a bonding with a unique IP address and connected to the SAN. Everything is working fine. I just had to manually tweak some points (MTU, other small things) but it is working. Recently, our SAN dealer told us that using bonding in an iSCSI context was terrible, and the recommendation is to use multipathing. My previous experience pre-oVirt was to agree with that. Long story short is just that when setting up the host from oVirt, it was so convenient to click and setup bonding, and observe it working that I did not pay further attention. (and we seem to have no bottleneck yet). Anyway, I dedicated a host to experiment, I things are not clear to me. I know how to setup NICs, iSCSI and multipath to present the host OS a partition or a logical volume, using multipathing instead of bonding. But in this precise case, what is disturbing me is that many layers described above are managed by oVirt (mount/unmount of LV, creation of bridges on top of bonded interfaces, managing the WWID amongst the cluster). And I see nothing related to multipath at the NICs level. Though I can setup everything fine in the host, this setup does not match what oVirt is expecting : oVirt is expecting a bridge named as the iSCSI network, and able to connect to the SAN. My multipathing is offering the access to the partition of the LUNs, it is not the same. I saw that multipathing is talked here : http://www.ovirt.org/Feature/iSCSI-Multipath I here read : The only tabs I see are "Storage/Logical Networks/Network QoS/Clusters/Permissions". In this datacenter, I have one iSCSI master storage domain, two iSCSI storage domains and one NFS export domain. What did I miss? Anyway, I'm not sure to understand the point of this wiki page and this implementation : it looks like a much higher level of multipathing over virtual networks, and not at all what I'm talking about above...? Well as you see, I need enlightenments. -- Nicolas Ecarnot