Re: [Users] compatibility rhev-m (regged, valid entitlement) + ovirt rhev-h for lab part

Hi Itamar, yep i expected some problems, but i didnt plan to mix rhev-h and ovirt-nodes in within the same cluster. as long as i dont have to expect to break other clusters i whould give it a try. subscriptions for the lab/staging are nonsense in that case, just not needed. and a 2nd management node, based on ovirt is also overkill. lets see if its killing my pets

cheers, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com <mailto:iheim@redhat.com>> wrote: On 10/31/2013 12:02 AM, squadra wrote: hi, i run a fully subscribed rhev 3.2 cluster, meaning rhev-m + rhev-h nodes. but, as most or all of you might understand it whould be wishable to use the free opensourced version for a extra pair of hostsystems which will be used as lab / testing envirement before live deploy of our stuff. so, anyone got experienice in compatibility of ovirt-node images and rhev-m (3.2 in my case). does this simply work? cheers, juergen -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! _________________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> rhev-m makes assumptions on the compatibility level. not all rhev versions are 1:1 with ovirt version as some features get disabled or backported to rhev. I wouldn't recommend mixing the two together. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users