Re: [Users] [libvirt] Migration issues with ovirt 3.3

> > > > > > yeah ! > > > It seems gluster uses it on both sides > > > > Since libvirt has been using this port range first, would you open a > > bug on gluster to avoid it? > > > > Dan. (prays that Vdsm is not expected to edit libvirt's migration port > > range on installation) > > If it makes you feel better, you can't even do that :-) Unfortunately, > the port range used for migration is hard-coded in libvirt. And since we > don't use port allocator yet (patches are in progress), we don't > automatically avoid ports that are already taken. All this is going to > change, though. Are these patches posted? Is there a libvirt BZ that tracks this issue? Dan.