On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Matt . <yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The deploy went OK from the GUI but it's still not
"active" as Hosted
engine Host. The install also wen very fast so it looked like it
didn't do anything witl the deploy setting in the GUI @ the hosted
engine tab.
The difference with a standard host is just that it should create
/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf and start ovirt-ha-agent
and ovirt-ha-broker so it shouldn't be that longer.
At the end, due to the issue with syncing the local maintenance mode
from the engine, you have to connect to the host and run
'hosted-engine -set-maintenance --mode=none' from there.
Can you please post the result of
hosted-engine --vm-status and the status of ovirt-ha-agent?
Or should I re-deploy again on the commandline after adding the host
through the GUI ?
About the initial GW, I didn't see that in the GUI.
2016-07-21 12:31 GMT+02:00 Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com>:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Matt . <yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> No problem I checked it out and applied it, no solution it seems.
>
> Do you mean that it's still referring to your initial gateway or that
> the deploy failed?
>
>> 2016-07-21 12:14 GMT+02:00 Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com>:
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Matt . <yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> OK, I did a deploy from the engine and the Hosted is "Not
Active" and
>>>
>>> Yes, sorry, I forgot to mention that.
>>> We have an open bug about re-activating an hosted-engine host from the
>>> engine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353600
>>> Connecting to the host and exiting the maintenance mode from there is
>>> the temporary solution.
>>>
>>>> Engine HA is empty on 4.0.1
>>>>
>>>> 2016-07-21 11:58 GMT+02:00 Matt . <yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com>:
>>>>> True, but you can up an IP on any device in that case because you
know
>>>>> what you are doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that this can be finetuned, or at least multiple IPs would
be
>>>>> nice as I now need to add one IP from my vrrp setup, so if there is
a
>>>>> failover.... or I need to take down the second switch I'm also
done.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-07-21 10:23 GMT+02:00 Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos(a)redhat.com>:
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Matt .
<yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> OK, I will check this laster on, as I was having issues with
the
>>>>>>> deploy from the GUI before as nothing really happened, I
thought it
>>>>>>> was a bug on the first 4.0 release ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think this should be investigated, the whole deployment as
it would
>>>>>>> be good to have the possibility to list some GW's in case
you use
>>>>>>> failover.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was even thinking of setting the engine IP there, should be
working
>>>>>>> as good as also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not really since the agent is pinging also when the engine VM is
down
>>>>>> due to maintenance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-07-21 9:53 GMT+02:00 Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos(a)redhat.com>:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Matt .
<yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> OK, I already thought that but where is this saved as
I don't have any
>>>>>>>>> rights as root to the ha_agent folder on the HE
storage ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's not a folder: it's a tar file directly saved
over a VDSM volume.
>>>>>>>> Editing it's a bit tricky.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In worst case scenario, how would i be able to deploy
a new hosted
>>>>>>>>> engine from a hosted engine ? This sounds undoable to
me and also
>>>>>>>>> unwanted as the HE is OK so far.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With a 4.0 engine, when you choose to deploy a new host
from the
>>>>>>>> webadmin or from the rest API you can also choose to
deploy it as an
>>>>>>>> hosted-engine host if the engine has been deployed with
hosted-engine.
>>>>>>>> In this case, if I'm not wrong, you can also specify
a different gateway value.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-21 9:41 GMT+02:00 Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos(a)redhat.com>:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Matt .
<yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Even when I change that on each host before I
do a new deploy it still
>>>>>>>>>>> uses the old GW address.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you deploy additional hosts with the CLI
utility, each new host
>>>>>>>>>> will be deployed consuming the answerfile
generated by the first host
>>>>>>>>>> and saved on the shared storage.
>>>>>>>>>> You have to manually tweak there if you to
avoid.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Another smarted option is to deploy additional HE
host from the
>>>>>>>>>> webadmin interface.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-21 9:24 GMT+02:00 Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos(a)redhat.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Matt .
<yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I tried to edit the answerfiles
on the other hosts to use another
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IP but it doesn't ping and still
uses the old GW address.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The gateway address is saved under
>>>>>>>>>>>>
/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
>>>>>>>>>>>> on each host.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-20 22:27 GMT+02:00 Matt .
<yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to be
able to add multiple addresses it should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ping in order of response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-20 22:13 GMT+02:00 Sandro
Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Il 20/Lug/2016 10:06 PM,
"Matt ." <yamakasi.014(a)gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to add a
host to a HE installation but my gateway is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pingable. It's a
floating IP which is usable but not pingable in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During the first install
of the HE I could give any IP to ping and I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used a source IP for the
floating GW address.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What can I do to get
around this as the network is OK, even when the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GW is not pingable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that gw not pingable
will be interpreted as network failure by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and will lower the
score of the hosts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea is welcome!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users