What happens when you configure the bond and then build the bridge manually over the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and not do anything. Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes configuration file as you expect (this is what used to screw me up) On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <joost@familiealbers.nl> wrote:
Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am dealing with loads of systems. in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate it, i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment.
Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like routing would break or something.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com [8]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler
<ckozleriii@gmail.com [7]> wrote:
What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC
manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script
This is fine. Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos@redhat.com [6]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl [3]>
wrote:
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nics
Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually.
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence >>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo() >>> >> Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py", line 298, in netinfo _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 109, in get
return _get(vdsmnets) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 101, in _get
report_network_qos(networking) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
line 46, in report_network_qos iface, = host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed?
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org [1] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [2]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org [4] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [5]
Links: ------ [1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org [2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl [4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org [5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com [7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com [8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com