On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Davide Ferrari <davide(a)billymob.com> wrote:
2016-09-23 15:57 GMT+02:00 Sahina Bose <sabose(a)redhat.com>:
>
> You could do this - where Node3 & Node 2 also has arbiter bricks. Arbiter
> bricks only store metadata and requires very low storage capacity compared
> to the data bricks.
>
> Node1 Node2 Node3 Node4
> brick1 brick1 arb-brick
> arb-brick brick1 brick1
>
Ok, cool! And this won't pose any problem if Node2 or Node4 fail?
No.
The syntax shuld be this:
gluster volume create data replica 3 arbiter 1 node1:/brick node2:/brick
node2:/arb_brick node3:/brick node4:/brick node4:/arb_brick
Correction: arb_bricks should be from a different node as below:
gluster volume create data replica 3 arbiter 1 node1:/brick node2:/brick
node3:/arb_brick node3:/brick node4:/brick node2:/arb_brick
is not a problem having more than a brick on the same host for the
volume
create syntax?
Thanks again
--
Davide Ferrari
Senior Systems Engineer